Legal analysis (laws)

Showing page of 84 results, sorted by

Protecting Syrians in Turkey: A Legal Analysis

Authors Meltem Ineli-Ciger
Year 2017
Journal Name INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFUGEE LAW
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
1 Journal Article

Race in mainland European legal analysis: towards a European critical race theory

Authors Mathias Möschel
Year 2011
Journal Name ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES
Citations (WoS) 15
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
2 Journal Article

ON THE MOVE "The reality of free movement for young European citizens migrating in times of crisis

Principal investigator Mercedes Fernández (Project Manager Spanish partner)
Description
The project builds on the assumption that barriers to the exercise of fundamental rights, in this case free movement, cannot be addressed unless accurately identified. When these deal with specific population groups, such as young people, this is all the more relevant. The obstacles that young people face with respect to legislation, access to finance and resources, to name but a few, are very different from other age groups. Complementing the existing knowledge through this perspective enriches the understanding of existing barriers and obstacles to free movement in a targeted way. The project adopts a unique methodology that operates on several levels and allows for the collection, analysis and synthesis of information in a way that it sheds light into aspects of free movement that have not been explored. It uses a mixed-method approach that combines: a) empirical field research through structured interviews with young people and national authorities in the participating countries b) data collection and targeted legal research in all partner countries; c) socio-legal analysis of the data collected and d) comparative analysis of the findings. Further, the project will raise awareness at national and EU level on barriers to free movement.
Year 2015
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
3 Project

Member States' social security agreements with India: Lessons for the future of a common EU approach

Authors Pauline Melin
Year 2018
Journal Name EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
4 Journal Article

Between a Rock and a Hard Place? A Legal Analysis of the Voluntary Repatriation of Guatemalan Refugees

Authors Y. Naqvi
Year 2004
Journal Name REFUGEE SURVEY QUARTERLY
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
5 Journal Article

Changing Paradigms in Migration Law Research

Authors Thomas Spijkerboer
Year 2018
Book Title Migration on the Move
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
6 Book Chapter

Dealing with Migrants in the Central Mediterranean Route: A Legal Analysis of Recent Bilateral Agreements Between Italy and Libya

Authors Andrea de Guttry, Francesca Capone, Emanuele Sommario
Year 2018
Journal Name INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION
Citations (WoS) 1
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
7 Journal Article

Dealing with Migrants in the Central Mediterranean Route: A Legal Analysis of Recent Bilateral Agreements Between Italy and Libya

Authors Andrea de Guttry, Emanuele Sommario, Francesca Capone
Year 2018
Journal Name INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
8 Journal Article

migration policies and military dictatorship in Argentina (1976-1983): the construction of a migratory model

Authors Lucila Sabrina Nejamkis
Year 2016
Journal Name PERFILES LATINOAMERICANOS
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
9 Journal Article

International Migration Policy and Law Analysis (IMPALA)

Description
The International Migration Policy And Law Analysis (IMPALA) Database is a cross-national, cross-institutional, cross-disciplinary project on comparative immigration policy. The pilot database version covers 10 years and 9 country cases including Australia, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and the United States of America. It covers The focus is admission policy, although the authors include also acquisition of citizenship, which is generally understood as being part of ‘immigrant policies’, namely what happens after admission. The project classifies and measures tracks of entry associated with five migration categories: economic migration, family reunification, asylum and humanitarian migration, and student migration, as well as acquisition of citizenship. It is the product of an international collaboration between researchers from George Mason University, Harvard University, London School of Economics and Political Science, Paris School of Economics, University of Amsterdam, University of Luxembourg, and University of Sydney.
Year 2008
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
10 Data Set

The relevance of critical race theory to educational theory and practice

Authors Jeanne M. Powers
Year 2007
Journal Name JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
11 Journal Article

Multilevel Governance and Migration: Conflicts Among Levels of Governance in the South Tyrol Case

Authors Roberta Medda-Windischer, Andrea Carlà
Book Title International Migrations and Local Governance
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
12 Book Chapter

The EU-Turkey-'deal': Legal Challenges and Pitfalls

Authors Roman Lehner
Year 2019
Journal Name INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION
Citations (WoS) 2
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
13 Journal Article

Deferred action and the discretionary state: migration, precarity and resistance

Authors SB Coutin, Sameer M. Ashar, Jennifer M. Chacon, ...
Year 2017
Journal Name CITIZENSHIP STUDIES
Citations (WoS) 3
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
14 Journal Article

Chinese Pressure to Repatriate Asylum Seekers: An International Law Analysis

Authors Andrew Wolman
Year 2017
Journal Name INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFUGEE LAW
Citations (WoS) 1
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
15 Journal Article

IMMIGRANT CHILDREN EDUCATION AS MEANS OF INTEGRATION: THE LITHUANIAN CASE

Authors Monika Orechova
Year 2018
Journal Name JOURNAL OF EDUCATION CULTURE AND SOCIETY
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
16 Journal Article

The EU-Turkey-'deal': Legal Challenges and Pitfalls

Authors Roman Lehner
Year 2019
Journal Name INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
17 Journal Article

International Cooperation on Migration Control: Towards a Research Agenda for Refugee Law

Authors Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen
Year 2018
Journal Name EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MIGRATION AND LAW
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
18 Journal Article

The Unintended Legal and Policy Relevance of EU Mobility Partnerships A Comparative Implementation Analysis of Morocco and Cape Verde

Authors Fanny Tittel-Mosser
Year 2018
Journal Name EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MIGRATION AND LAW
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
19 Journal Article

Turning the Immigration Policy Paradox Upside Down? Populist Liberalism and Discursive Gaps in South America

Authors Diego Acosta Arcarazo, Luisa Feline Freier
Year 2015
Journal Name INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION REVIEW
Citations (WoS) 11
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
20 Journal Article

Normative Interaction and Law-Making: Regulating Migration in the Maghreb

Description
This project explores law-making in the domain of migration in the Maghreb as a result of interaction between diverse exogenous and endogenous normative factors. It builds and tests an innovative approach to reforms undertaken since 2003 in three countries, namely Tunisia, Morocco and Mauritania, to improve the knowledge and understanding of legal development in the Maghreb. It unfolds the plurality of interactions that result in the law being reformed in these countries and the country-specificity of law-making in a field where law is being globalised. Drawing on comparative law, international law, sociology of law, human geography and political science, the project examines how recent regulations affecting migration (entry and stay in a territory, exit from the territory, citizenship and asylum) have been thought, elaborated and adopted in each of the three Maghreb countries covered by the project. It therefore goes into the details and mechanisms of law-making and leads to designing a comparative model of normative interactions in national law-making. This project provides an unprecedented analysis of legal development in the Maghreb and a valuable contribution to the understanding of normative interactions in the field of migration. Innovative from theoretical, empirical and methodological perspectives, it develops a coherent analytical framework of law-making, aimed to be replicable across policy and geographical areas. It is hosted in a research centre at Aix-Marseille University, France, which combines excellence in legal research and a unique multidisciplinary academic pool rooted in the Mediterranean. It resorts to field research in Morocco, Tunisia and Mauritania and a network of partners in these countries to benefit from local input and favour knowledge-sharing. This project provides supportive policy tools to strengthen the external dimension of EU’s immigration and asylum policy and a renewed partnership between the EU and its Southern Neighbourhood.
Year 2013
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
21 Project

Democratic Efficacy and the Varieties of Populism in Europe

Description
DEMOS is built on the assumption that populism is symptomatic of a disconnect between how democratic polities operate and how citizens perceive their own aspirations, needs and identities within the political system. As such, DEMOS explores the practical value of ’democratic efficacy’ as the condition of political engagement needed to address the challenge of populism. The concept combines attitudinal features (political efficacy), political skills, knowledge, and democratic opportunity structures. In order to better understand populism DEMOS addresses its hitherto under-researched aspects at micro-, meso-, and macro-levels: its socio-psychological roots, social actors’ responses to the populist challenge, and populism’s effects on governance. DEMOS focuses not only on the polity, but equally on citizens’ perspectives: how they are affected by, and how they react to, populism. Politically underrepresented groups and those targeted by populist politics are a particular focus, e.g. youth, women, and migrants. As populism has varying socially embedded manifestations, DEMOS aims at contextualising it through comparative analysis on the variety of populisms across Europe, including their historical, cultural, and socioeconomic roots, manifestations, and impacts. DEMOS develops indicators and predictors of populism and elaborates scenarios on the interactions of populism with social actors and institutions both at the national and the EU levels. Unifying 15 partners from 10 disciplines, DEMOS combines in-depth research on populism and democratic efficacy with action research and pilot projects in order to develop lasting tools and timely policy recommendations; project methods include experiments, deliberative polling, text mining, surveys, and legal analysis. DEMOS places strong emphasis on communication and productive interactions with a variety of stakeholders throughout the project, including policymakers, journalists, students, and the general public.
Year 2018
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
22 Project

Refugees are Migrants: Refugee Mobility, Recognition and Rights

Description
This project begins with the basic premise that refugees are migrants: by legal definition and political conception, they have left their home countries to seek refuge. This project aims to re-assess refugee protection through a lens of mobility and migration, locating the study of refugee law in the context of the refugee regime. It examines the three key aspects of refugee law – access to protection, refugee status determination, and refugee rights – bringing them into conversation with the refugee regime’s norms and practices on responsibility-sharing and solutions. Crucially, the project takes a long and broad view of refugee protection, in order to open up new possibilities and trajectories. It also integrates a legal assessment of the role of non-state actors in refugee protection. Using the broad notion of ‘intermediary’ in the migration process, it will assess the regulatory environment on access to protection, so-called ‘secondary movement’ and onward migration. It will provide an important legal assessment of the role of the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) and the duties of humanitarian actors in refugee protection. It addresses the EU, not as a singularity, but as an actor in the global regime. The project is methodologically ground-breaking. It identifies practices that determine access to and the quality of refugee protection, and how these practices have developed across jurisdictions and over time, thereby historicizing and reframing the practices in question. As well as rigorous doctrinal (‘black letter’) legal analysis, it will use go beyond doctrine, and draw on theoretical conceptions of legality to explore the particular modes of regulating mobility and migration that are now central to refugee protection. It will also develop new inter-disciplinary methods, using comparative legal, historical and political-scientific tools.
Year 2018
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
23 Project

Regulating mixed intimacies in Europe

Description
This project is a study of the regulation of ‘mixture’(‘interracial’ sex, relationships and marriage) in Europe’s past and present. Informed by critical race and critical mixed race studies, it challenges the common assumption that Europe never had ‘anti-miscegenation’ laws comparable to those in the United States. In exploring if, when, how and why forms of regulation aiming to prevent or restrict ‘interracial mixture’ developed in Europe in certain times and places, the project delivers a vital contribution to our knowledge of the development of racial thinking in Europe. The concept of ‘mixture’ provides an eminently suitable approach to the construction of ‘race’, since ‘mixture’ confuses and destabilizes racialized categories that seem fixed and essentialized in specific times and places, such as ‘black/white’. The project consist of a historical and a contemporary part. The historical part looks at the regulation of ‘mixture’ in four European countries: France, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, in their African colonies, and wartime Europe. The contemporary part explores whether and how, in spite of norms of formal equality and colour-blindness, ‘race’ and ‘monoracial family norms’ still play a part in European law and the lived experiences of ‘interracial’ couples with law in their everyday lives. Through archival research, legal analysis and interviews with modern-day ‘mixed’ couples and families, this approach helps us understand what lawmakers and enforcers believed ‘race’ was, what they believed ‘mixture’ was, how this was translated into legal practices, and how targeted couples responded. Theoretically, the project delivers a groundbreaking contribution to the genealogy of racial thinking in Europe, especially in addressing the understudied role of law and legal scholarship in the social construction of ‘race’ and ‘mixture’ in a increasingly diverse Europe.
Year 2017
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
24 Project

Popular Sovereignty vs. the Rule of Law? Defining the Limits of Direct Democracy

Description
Should the people be allowed to vote on the adoption of immigration restrictions that violate international law? Should it be permissible to launch a citizens’ initiative demanding the reintroduction of the death penalty? May a proposal be put to a popular vote despite the fact that voters are not properly informed about its effects? With the mushrooming of direct-democratic instruments throughout Europe and the introduction of the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI), the relationship between popular sovereignty and the rule of law is set to become one of the defining political issues of our time. Yet despite their great practical relevance, the questions of where the legal limits of direct democracy should be drawn and how compliance with these limits should be reviewed have remained almost completely unexplored. This leaves a major gap in the research that has serious repercussions for the functionality and legitimacy of direct democracy. It is the ambitious objective of LIDD to provide the scientific basis for resolving this urgent challenge. By innovatively combining comparative legal analysis with both qualitative and quantitative methods from other social sciences, the project builds on the experience made with various direct-democratic mechanisms in order to develop general conclusions. Part 1 of LIDD distils a core of issues that is regarded as being beyond the reach of direct democracy across all European states and elaborates best practices that will help states define and apply the limits of direct democracy in a sensible way. Part 2 identifies common European minimum standards that institutional and procedural systems for reviewing compliance with these limits must satisfy and makes suggestions for improving these systems. Part 3 applies the findings from Parts 1 and 2 to the EU level; it shows how the admissibility requirements that an ECI must meet should be adapted and clarified and how the admissibility procedure could be improved.
Year 2018
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
25 Project

Brexit and Deportations: towards a comprehensive and transnational understanding of a new system targeting EU citizens

Description
With Brexit and the abandonment of the free movement and residence principle, the UK will define its new immigration policy concerning EU nationals. The new immigration policies will aim to control and circumscribe the mobility of the citizens of the EU member states, currently free to travel, live and work in the UK. They may also be returned or deported only under very specific circumstances. Following Brexit, those who will not comply with the new regulations will become deportable. The aim of the project is to research the implementation of the new UK deportation system concerning EU nationals. The fellow will propose a comprehensive approach to the UK deportation regime, taking into account its various components: (1) immigration policies, (2) agencies that enforce them, (3) public debate that accompanies changes in migration policies and their implementation, (4) migrants that become deportable and are deported, as well as (5) return migrants and stayers back in sending countries who consider migrating to the UK and who adjust their (im)mobility strategies according to, or resisting, migration policies. The project assumes that the deportation regime is a transnational phenomenon, since it concerns not only people in migrant-receiving countries, but also in migrant-sending counties. The research offers an analysis of the largest migrant group in the UK, the Poles. The case of the Polish migrants will offer an insight into how the transnational UK deportation regime becomes rooted among migrants and develops back in their hometown communities. The project draws upon interdisciplinary qualitative methodologies, including multi-sited ethnography, Critical Discourse Analysis of media, and legal analysis. Its outcomes will reach EU, UK and Polish policy makers, influential think tanks, the academic community and the general public.
Year 2018
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
26 Project

Implications for Policy and Practice

Authors Martha J. Chinouya, Peter J. Aspinall
Book Title The African Diaspora Population in Britain
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
27 Book Chapter

Re-actualisation of Honesty as a Principle in Human Rights in the Nusantara Constitution

Authors Jazim Hamidi
Year 2018
Journal Name PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
28 Journal Article

US Census Classifications and Arab Americans: Contestations and Definitions of Identity Markers

Authors Randa Kayyali
Year 2013
Journal Name JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES
Citations (WoS) 7
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
29 Journal Article

Human Trafficking in Eastern Europe: The Case of Bulgaria

Authors Georgi Petrunov
Year 2014
Journal Name ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
30 Journal Article

Cause Lawyering and Resistance in Israel: The Legal Strategies of Adalah

Authors Elian Weizman
Year 2016
Journal Name SOCIAL & LEGAL STUDIES
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32 Journal Article

Beyond Treatment and Impact: A Context-Oriented Approach to Employment Discrimination

Authors C. Elizabeth Hirsh
Year 2014
Journal Name AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
33 Journal Article

Was „macht“ Migration mit deutschem Verwaltungsrecht?

Principal investigator Larissa Vetters (Principal Investigator)
Description
... Eine rechtsethnologische Untersuchung des Aufeinandertreffens von migrantischen Lebensentwürfen und rechtlicher Systembildung in verwaltungsgerichtlichen Streitfällen "Hypothese ist, dass zwischen Migranten und staatlichen Akteuren eine Interaktionssituation entsteht, von der auch jenseits des Gesetzgebungsprozesses Impulse für eine Rechtsentwicklung ausgehen. Zentrale Fragen sind, wie Migranten als Akteure die Möglichkeiten verwaltungsgerichtlichen Rechtsschutzes erleben, wie Rechtsanwender in ihrem Arbeitsalltag Migrationsdynamiken und -folgen bearbeiten und welche Auswirkungen diese soziale Praxis auf das Verwaltungsrecht und die Rechtsstaatsvorstellungen der beteiligten Akteure hat. Dr. Vetters geht von der Hypothese aus, dass zwischen Migranten und staatlichen Akteuren eine Interaktionssituation entsteht, von der in der Rechtswirklichkeit auch jenseits des Gesetzgebungsprozesses intendierte und unintendierte Impulse für eine Rechtsentwicklung und eine Transformation von Rechtsstaatsvorstellungen ausgehen. In einer empirischen Untersuchung wird diese Interaktionsdynamik einschließlich der aus ihr resultierenden Prozesse der Rechtsfortbildung und -transformation systematisch erfasst und im Hinblick auf die Ausgestaltung von Rechtsstaatlichkeit unter Bedingungen soziokultureller Pluralisierung in Deutschland eingeordnet. Zunächst wird hierfür eine Datengrundlage in Form einer Falldatenbank mit mindestens 200 Fällen geschaffen, die bislang fehlt, da insbesondere die Justizstatistik keine Daten über den Migrationshintergrund enthält. Dazu werden zunächst explorative Interviews mit Migranten geführt, um so Rechtsgebiete zu identifizieren, die – neben den klassischen Gebieten wie dem Ausländer- und Asylrecht – für die migrantische Biographie von besonderer Relevanz sind bzw. in denen der Migrationshintergrund eine Rolle spielt. Für diese Referenzgebiete sollen dann weitere Daten durch teilnehmende Beobachtung, Interviews und Analyse schriftlicher Quellen in den Akteursfeldern „Migranten“, „Anwalt/Rechtsberatungsorganisation“, „Verwaltungsgericht“ und „Behörden“ erhoben werden. Aus dieser Falldatenbank sollen dann solche Fälle ausgewählt werden, in denen sich unterschiedliche Aspekte der Rechtsentwicklung und Transformationen von Rechtsstaatsvorstellungen andeuten. Auf dieser Grundlage ist geplant, 12 bis 16 detaillierte Einzelfallstudien zu bilden, anhand derer unterschiedliche Aspekte der Rechtsentwicklung und Transformation von Rechtsstaatsvorstellungen dokumentiert und analysiert werden können. Anhand verschiedener Teilfragen werden dabei die beiden großen Teilbereiche untersucht, welche Transformationen der Ordnungsidee der Rechtsstaatlichkeit in der Rechtswirklichkeit als Ergebnis von Interaktionen zwischen den am verwaltungsgerichtlichen Verfahren beteiligten Akteuren zu beobachten sind und inwiefern transformierte Rechtsstaatsvorstellungen der Akteure auf die Rechtsanwendung und -entwicklung zurückwirken."
Year 2015
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
34 Project

Conceptualising citizenship regime(s) in post-Dayton Bosnia and Herzegovina

Authors Eldar Sarajlic
Year 2012
Journal Name CITIZENSHIP STUDIES
Citations (WoS) 9
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
35 Journal Article

Becoming a victim of trafficking

Authors Milena Jaksic
Year 2013
Journal Name ACTES DE LA RECHERCHE EN SCIENCES SOCIALES
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
36 Journal Article

The Complexities of Dual Citizenship Analysis

Authors Dorota Pudzianowska
Year 2017
Journal Name Central and Eastern European Migration Review
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
37 Journal Article

"The EU Should Talk to Germany" Transnational Legal Consciousness as a Rights Claiming Tool among Undocumented Migrants

Authors Helen Schwenken
Year 2013
Journal Name INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
38 Journal Article

Legal Regulation of the Migration Processes in the Russian Federation

Authors Lidyia Dadunovna Burinova, Artur Mikhailovich Burinov, Elza Vladimirovna Dorzhi-Goryaeva, ...
Year 2018
Journal Name TARIH KULTUR VE SANAT ARASTIRMALARI DERGISI-JOURNAL OF HISTORY CULTURE AND ART RESEARCH
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
39 Journal Article

"The EU Should Talk to Germany" Transnational Legal Consciousness as a Rights Claiming Tool among Undocumented Migrants

Authors Helen Schwenken
Year 2013
Journal Name INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION
Citations (WoS) 7
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
40 Journal Article

Back to basics: The conditions of just refugee returns

Authors Megan Bradley
Year 2008
Journal Name JOURNAL OF REFUGEE STUDIES
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
41 Journal Article

Back to basics: The conditions of just refugee returns

Authors Megan Bradley
Year 2008
Journal Name JOURNAL OF REFUGEE STUDIES
Citations (WoS) 11
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
42 Journal Article

A slow ride towards permanent residency: legal transitions and the working trajectories of Ukrainian migrants in Italy and Spain

Authors Francesca Alice Vianello, Claudia Finotelli, Elisa Brey
Year 2019
Journal Name JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
43 Journal Article

Court decisions over marriage migration in Finland: a problem with transnational family ties

Authors Johanna Leinonen, Saara Pellander
Year 2014
Journal Name JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES
Citations (WoS) 15
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
44 Journal Article

Fair and Consistent Border Controls? A Critical, Multi-methodological and Interdisciplinary Study of Asylum Adjudication in Europe

Description
‘Consistency’ is regularly cited as a desirable attribute of border control, but it has received little critical social scientific attention. This inter-disciplinary project, at the inter-face between critical human geography, border studies and law, will scrutinise the consistency of European asylum adjudication in order to develop richer theoretical understanding of this lynchpin concept. It will move beyond the administrative legal concepts of substantive and procedural consistency by advancing a three-fold conceptualisation of consistency – as everyday practice, discursive deployment of facts and disciplinary technique. In order to generate productive intellectual tension it will also employ an explicitly antagonistic conceptualisation of the relationship between geography and law that views law as seeking to constrain and systematise lived space. The project will employ an innovative combination of methodologies that will produce unique and rich data sets including quantitative analysis, multi-sited legal ethnography, discourse analysis and interviews, and the findings are likely to be of interest both to academic communities like geographers, legal and border scholars and to policy makers and activists working in border control settings. In 2013 the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) was launched to standardise the procedures of asylum determination. But as yet no sustained multi-methodological assessment of the claims of consistency inherent to the CEAS has been carried out. This project offers not only the opportunity to assess progress towards harmonisation of asylum determination processes in Europe, but will also provide a new conceptual framework with which to approach the dilemmas and risks of inconsistency in an area of law fraught with political controversy and uncertainty around the world. Most fundamentally, the project promises to debunk the myths surrounding the possibility of fair and consistent border controls in Europe and elsewhere.
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
45 Project

ASYFAIR: Fair and Consistent Border Controls? A Critical, Multi-methodological and Interdisciplinary Study of Asylum Adjudication in Europe

Description
‘Consistency’ is regularly cited as a desirable attribute of border control, but it has received little critical social scientific attention. This inter-disciplinary project, at the inter-face between critical human geography, border studies and law, will scrutinise the consistency of European asylum adjudication in order to develop richer theoretical understanding of this lynchpin concept. It will move beyond the administrative legal concepts of substantive and procedural consistency by advancing a three-fold conceptualisation of consistency – as everyday practice, discursive deployment of facts and disciplinary technique. In order to generate productive intellectual tension it will also employ an explicitly antagonistic conceptualisation of the relationship between geography and law that views law as seeking to constrain and systematise lived space. The project will employ an innovative combination of methodologies that will produce unique and rich data sets including quantitative analysis, multi-sited legal ethnography, discourse analysis and interviews, and the findings are likely to be of interest both to academic communities like geographers, legal and border scholars and to policy makers and activists working in border control settings. In 2013 the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) was launched to standardise the procedures of asylum determination. But as yet no sustained multi-methodological assessment of the claims of consistency inherent to the CEAS has been carried out. This project offers not only the opportunity to assess progress towards harmonisation of asylum determination processes in Europe, but will also provide a new conceptual framework with which to approach the dilemmas and risks of inconsistency in an area of law fraught with political controversy and uncertainty around the world. Most fundamentally, the project promises to debunk the myths surrounding the possibility of fair and consistent border controls in Europe and elsewhere.
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
46 Project

Secondary Cities of Europe: The Case of Regional Industrial Development in Turkey

Description
This project will investigate the interaction between Turkey's accession to the European Union (EU) and industrial transformation of the EU with a focus on Turkey’s three developing cities: Denizli, Kayseri, and Gaziantep. The Customs Union Agreement of 1995 between EU and Turkey generated a massive growth in Turkey’s industrial exports. Although Denizli, Kayseri, and Gaziantep are not located within the older industrial regions of the country, they managed to surpass national growth rates within this period. Their performance signifies a regional redistribution of industries and justifies the following research question: How has the accession process since 1995 been shaping the regional distribution of manufacturing industries in Turkey? The project will focus on national, local, and enterprise-level dynamics respectively: 1) Changes in National Policymaking: This phase will be composed of interviews with government agencies and non-governmental organizations and the analysis of the legal documents and secondary data in Ankara; capital of Turkey. The aim is to illustrate the changes in industrial policymaking since 1995. 2) Local Industrial and Urban Developments: The field research in Denizli, Gaziantep, and Kayseri will focus on migration, capital movements, urban transformation, and agglomeration effects since 1995. The aim is to analyze the local interactions between accession-related policies and industrial dynamics. 3) Enterprise-Level Dynamics: Company monographs will focus on the growth strategy of selected enterprises, changes in their shop floor relations, and profile of their customers and subsidiaries. The aim is to investigate the impact of accession-related policymaking on the performance of industrial enterprises in these cities. The project findings will illustrate the actual consequences of the current industrial policymaking in Turkey at the local level and make policy suggestions for an effective EU-wide industrial and innovation strategy.
Year 2012
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
47 Project

Deprivation of Citizenship: Is There an Issue of EU Law?

Authors Jo Shaw
Book Title Debating Transformations of National Citizenship
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
48 Book Chapter

Assessment and Implementation of the “Scientific Visa Package” (Researchers Directive 2005/71/EC and Recommendation 2005/761/EC)

Principal investigator Claire Healy (Project Coordinator)
Description
In 2005 the European Commission adopted the "Scientific Visa" package to make scientific careers more attractive and open up the Community to third-country nationals who might be admitted for the purposes of research. The package includes Directive 2005/71/EC on a specific procedure for admitting third-country nationals for the purposes of scientific research and Recommendation 2005/761/EC aiming to facilitate the issue by the Member States of uniform short-stay visas for researchers from third countries travelling within the Community for the purpose of carrying out scientific research. This ICMPD study, commissioned by the European Commission, covers the implementation and impact of the aspects of the package covered in the Directive and the Recommendation in all 27 EU member states. This forms part of a broader study on human resource policies and practices in research, on the “Scientific Visa” package and on the implementation of pan-EU pension schemes targeted at researchers. This is to provide support for a monitoring system on national policies on human resources in research and on their effects at the level of research organisations, foreseen in the 2009 People Specific Programme of the 7th Framework Programme. This should lead to improved knowledge of policy developments and actions on human resources in the European Research Area and their effects at the level of research organisations and improve the knowledge base for future policy developments. Specific aims • to conduct a conformity analysis of the legal and administrative framework in the 27 EU Member States for implementation of the Directive and Recommendation • to analyse the institutional set-up and implementation in practice of the provisions of the two legal instruments in the 27 EU Member States • to evaluate the impact of the research residence permits and visas on the basis of both quantitative and qualitative data and research • to identify any potential difficulties in implementation and suggestions for improvement • to identify good practices in relation to the implementation of the Directive and the Recommendation Outcomes Comparative report on Directive 2005/71/EC in 27 EU Member States: • Conformity analysis of how Member States have transposed the Directive into national law • Statistical analysis illustrating the impact of the Directive in quantitative terms • Assessment of the impact of the Directive, and identification of difficulties and good practices in its implementation, through extensive national and EU-level research and questionnaires Comparative report on Recommendation 2005/761/EC in 27 EU Member States • Analysis of the national legal and/or administrative frameworks relating to the Recommendation • Account of the authorities responsible and the institutional and procedural set-up for the implementation of these provisions • Assessment of the impact of the Recommendation, and identification of difficulties and good practices in its implementation, through extensive national and EU-level research and questionnaires
Year 2011
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
49 Project

Geographies of generation: age restrictions in international adoption

Authors Jessaca B. Leinaweaver
Year 2015
Journal Name SOCIAL & CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY
Citations (WoS) 1
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
50 Journal Article

The crime drop in comparative perspective: the impact of the economy and imprisonment on American and European burglary rates

Authors Richard Rosenfeld, Steven Messner
Year 2009
Journal Name BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
Citations (WoS) 49
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
51 Journal Article

When "Inclusion" Means "Exclusion": Discourses on the Eviction and Repatriations of Roma Migrants, at National and European Union Level

Authors Dragos Ciulinaru
Year 2018
Journal Name JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION AND INTEGRATION
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
52 Journal Article

When "Inclusion" Means "Exclusion": Discourses on the Eviction and Repatriations of Roma Migrants, at National and European Union Level

Authors Dragos Ciulinaru
Year 2018
Journal Name JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION AND INTEGRATION
Citations (WoS) 1
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
53 Journal Article

Discourse and Migration

Authors Teun A. van Dijk
Book Title Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
54 Book Chapter

Regulating Movement of the Very Mobile: Selected Legal and Policy Aspects of Ukrainian Migration to EU Countries

Authors Monika Szulecka
Book Title Ukrainian Migration to the European Union
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
55 Book Chapter

Queering Asylum in Europe: A Survey Report

Authors Carmelo Danisi, Vítor Lopes Andrade, Moira Dustin, ...
Description
This report discusses the data gathered through two surveys carried out in the context of the SOGICA project. SOGICA – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Claims of Asylum: A European human rights challenge – is a four-year (2016-2020) research project funded by the European Research Council (ERC) that explores the social and legal experiences of people across Europe claiming international protection on the basis of their sexual orientation or gender identity (SOGI).
Year 2020
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
56 Report

The EU, Turkey and Refugees: The need for humanitarian approaches

Authors Richard Burchill
Description
he world is experiencing the highest levels of human displacement ever, with over seventy million people affected around the world. The conflicts in Syria and the wider Middle East have caused millions of people to flee their homes and livelihoods. In 2016 the United Nations General Assembly adopted the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, recognising the need for increased global cooperation to address the situation of refugees through a humanitarian, people-focused approach. Confronting the challenge of large numbers of refugees seeking new lives in Europe as a consequence of displacement from war and conflict in Syria and Iraq, the EU and Turkey reached a series of agreements that led to Turkey undertaking to restrict the flow of people – an arrangement that continues to affect some 3.5 million humans in need. This paper argues that the agreements struck between the EU and Turkey for controlling the refugee situation have not maintained a humanitarian approach. Instead, they have been, and continue to be, marked by a divisive and politicised discourse that reflects underlying tensions between the two parties rather than addressing the urgent requirements of a vulnerable population. This paper addresses the problems created by the EU-Turkey approach to handling refugees and explores options for pursuing a more humanitarian approach.
Year 2020
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
57 Report

Governing protracted displacement: An analysis across global, regional and domestic contexts

Authors Nuno Ferreira, Carolien Jacobs, Pamela Kea, ...
Year 2020
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
58 Working Paper

Constructing Roma migrants : European narratives and local governance

Authors Tina MAGAZZINI, Stefano PIEMONTESE
Year 2019
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
59 Book

Crossing the Eastern Mediterranean Sea in Search of “Protection”

Authors Dallal Stevens, Angeliki Dimitriadi
Year 2019
Journal Name Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
60 Journal Article

La mer à la croisée des chemins: l’impact juridique de la superposition de régimes juridiques sur l’effectivité de la police en mer

Principal investigator Kiara Neri (Principal Investigator), Marie-Laure Basilien-Gainche (Coordinator)
Description
La proposition est née de l’actualité maritime européenne. La mer est en effet devenu pour l’Europe un enjeu majeur de sécurité. Un grand nombre d’études juridiques se sont donc concentrées sur les phénomènes migratoires, la montée de la criminalité sur les océans ou encore les enjeux environnementaux. Toutefois, ces études restent pour l’essentiel sectorielles et ne saisissent pas le phénomène maritime dans son intégralité. Or afin de préserver au mieux la sécurité en Europe, l’approche cloisonnée développée par la recherche en droit international et européen ne peut plus suffire. Le présent projet se propose donc de décloisonner les approches et de mettre l’accent sur les différends corps de règles applicables aux espaces maritimes. Le millefeuille juridique d’appliquant à la mer rend en effet l’organisation de la police en mer très complexe et nuit à son efficacité, à la surveillance des espaces maritimes et à la protection des droits et libertés des personnes. Les questions de criminalité (terrorisme maritime, piraterie, pêche illicite, trafics de migrants, d’êtres humains, de drogue, etc.) d’une part et la question du respect des droits fondamentaux face à ces activités de police d’autre part forment le substrat de l’étude. Elle s’inscrit alors parfaitement dans le champ du défi qui recouvre la clarification des missions régaliennes en matière de sécurité et la gestion des risques, ici essentiellement humains et environnementaux. Les résultats de l’étude feront l’objet d’une publication régulière au sein des revues spécialisées en droit international, en droit de la mer ou en droit européen, notamment à la suite des travaux réalisés par le Doctorant et le Post-Doc recrutés par le projet. Ces publications périodiques seront également complétées par au moins deux publications collectives des membres de l’équipe de recherche. Ces publications sont des publications scientifiques dans le domaine de la science juridique et disposeront d’une diffusion la plus large notamment grâce à leur caractère bilingue, en français et en anglais. Par ailleurs, le projet a pour ambition de devenir une force de proposition en proposant des solutions concrètes à mettre en œuvre dans le cadre des politiques publiques aussi bien au niveau national (ministères de l’Intérieur, de la Défense et des Affaires étrangères) qu’européen (Commission européenne notamment). Des contacts avec ces institutions sont en cours d’établissement. Ils seront opérationnels pour janvier 2018. La coordinatrice s’appuiera sur une équipe scientifique de haute qualité. Des liens scientifiques ont en effet pu être tissés lors du projet MARSAFENET financé par la Commission européenne (COST ACTION) sous la direction du Professeur Gemma ANDREONE. Le projet s’appuie donc sur des coopérations scientifiques déjà en place et solides. Il y inclut néanmoins de nouveaux membres, en fonction des besoins. Les résultats du projet auront des retombées dans le champ de la recherche fondamentale en droit, et plus précisément en droit international et européen. Toutefois, ces résultats ne se limitent pas à la recherche théorique, même si elle reste fondamentale pour le rayonnement de nos Universités. En effet, l’objectif premier de l’étude est de permettre des retombées pratiques sur l’effectivité de la police maritime et donc, par voie de conséquences sur la sécurité européenne.
Year 2019
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
62 Project

La representación política de las personas de origen inmigrante en España e Italia

Authors Daniela Vintila, Laura Morales
Year 2018
Journal Name Papers: Revista de Sociologia
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
64 Journal Article

Migration und Polizei – Auswirkungen der Zuwanderung auf die Organisation und Diversität der deutschen Polizei

Principal investigator Antonio Vera (Principal Investigator ), Martin Brussig (Principal Investigator ), Rafael Behr (Principal Investigator ), Anja Weiß (Principal Investigator )
Description
"Migration ist in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland kein neues Phänomen, sondern stets ein wichtiger Treiber für gesellschaftlichen und institutionellen Wandel gewesen. Sie stellt eine permanente gesellschaftliche Herausforderung dar, die sich durch die aktuelle Flüchtlingssituation verschärft hat und deren Bewältigung nicht zuletzt dem Staat und seinen Institutionen obliegt. Die deutschen Polizeien des Bundes und der Länder mit ihren mehr als 300.000 Beschäftigten sind in vielerlei Hinsicht intensiv von der Zuwanderung betroffen. Migranten können als Teil der Bevölkerung Opfer von Straftaten werden und ebenso als Täter in Erscheinung treten. Als sichtbarster Vertreter des Staates stellt die Polizei aber auch eine wichtige Anlaufstelle für Mi­granten bei der Bewältigung von Herausforderungen in ihrem neuen Lebensumfeld dar. Das Handeln und die Wertvorstellungen der einzelnen Polizeibeamten werden dabei nicht selten mit der Einstellung der vermeintlichen „Mehrheitsgesellschaft“ gleichgesetzt. Insofern spielt die Polizei eine zentrale Rolle bei der gesellschaftlichen Integration von Zuwanderern. Die Polizei hat in der Vergangenheit auf die migrationsbedingten Herausforderungen auf vielfältige Art und Weise reagiert. Im Mittelpunkt standen Bemühungen, Polizeibeamten interkulturelle Kompetenz zu vermitteln und die Diversität der Belegschaft zu erhöhen, indem Beamte mit Migrationshintergrund rekrutiert wurden. Darüber hinaus wurden Organisationsstrukturen und -prozesse angepasst, beispielsweise durch die Einrichtung von Kompetenzzentren für interkulturelle Aufgaben oder die Berücksichtigung interkultureller Aspekte bei der Präventionsarbeit. Eine systematische Bestandsaufnahme und gezielte Weiterentwicklung des damit verbundenen institutionellen Wandels hat allerdings kaum stattgefunden. Vor diesem Hintergrund analysiert das Projekt MIGRATE die Prozesse institutionellen Wandels, mit denen die Polizei auf die Herausforderungen der Migration reagiert, sowie deren Folgen. Im Mittelpunkt sollen die Organisationsgestaltung der Polizei, ihr Personal- und Diversitätsmanagement, die Bürger-Polizei-Interaktion sowie die Organisationskultur der Polizei stehen, wobei insb. qualitative empirische Methoden eingesetzt werden sollen. Die erforderlichen Daten sollen in den Landespolizeien Nordrhein-Westfalens, Baden-Württembergs, Berlins und Hamburgs erhoben werden, was angesichts der Bevölkerungszahlen in diesen Ländern und ihrer strukturellen Vielfalt systematische Vergleiche und damit Erkenntnisse erlaubt, die über den konkreten Einzelfall hinausreichen. Zudem sollen Polizeibeamte, die an der Akademie der Polizei Hamburg sowie an der Deutschen Hochschule der Polizei ein Studium absolvieren, befragt werden. MIGRATE zielt auf die Gewinnung von Erkenntnissen darüber ab, wie sich die deutsche Polizei als zentrale gesellschaftliche Institution in Reaktion auf Einwanderung verändert hat und weiterhin verändern wird. In empirischen Studien soll untersucht werden, ob und wie eine interkulturelle Öffnung der Polizei stattfindet, auf welche Art und Weise die Partizipation von Migranten erfolgt und welche organisationalen sowie integrativen Effekte dies hat. Diese sollen in Fachzeitschriften publiziert sowie über entsprechende Angebote der Projektpartner in die polizeiliche Aus- und Fortbildung einfließen. Auf diese Weise soll auf eine höhere interkulturelle Kompetenz der Polizei und eine Optimierung ihrer Organisationsstrukturen und Arbeitsprozesse hingewirkt und zugleich zur gesellschaftlichen Integration von Migranten beigetragen werden. Dabei ermöglicht die Betrachtung der Länderpolizeien von zwei großen Flächenländern und zwei Stadtstaaten umfassende Vergleiche von Polizeibehörden unterschiedlichen Typs in ihren jeweiligen räumlichen Kontexten. MIGRATE ist als interdisziplinäres und institutionenübergreifendes Verbundprojekt angelegt, das aus anwendungsorientierter Perspektive empirische Forschung betreibt und auf diese Weise innovative und praxisbezogene Ansätze zur Optimierung der migrationsbezogenen Polizeiarbeit, der Beziehungen zwischen Polizei und Migranten und der Chancengleichheit und gesellschaftlichen Teilhabe von Migranten entwickelt."
Year 2018
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
65 Project

What's in a Name? Causes and Consequences of Labelling Minorities as “National” or “Migrant”: Roma in Italy and Spain

Authors Tina Magazzini
Year 2018
Journal Name International Migration
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
66 Journal Article

Perpetuating Anti-Muslim Discrimination through the Interpretation of Religious Equality in the European Court of Human Rights

Authors Pier-Luc Dupont
Year 2018
Journal Name Journal of Muslims in Europe
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
67 Journal Article

Report on political participation of mobile EU citizens : Belgium

Authors Daniela Vintila, Louise Nikolic, Jean-Michel Lafleur
Description
En Belgique, les citoyens de l’UE et les ressortissants de pays tiers ont le droit de voter aux élections locales. Les ressortissants de pays tiers jouissent de ce droit après cinq ans de résidence ininterrompue en Belgique. Les citoyens de l’UE ont également le droit de se présenter comme candidat aux élections locales. De plus, ces derniers ont le droit de voter et de se présenter comme candidats aux élections européennes. Les droits électoraux des citoyens belges résidant à l’étranger sont plus restrictifs. En effet, les citoyens non-résidents ont le droit de voter mais pas de se présenter comme candidats aux élections législatives. Les citoyens belges ont également le droit de voter aux élections européennes s’ils résident dans un pays membre de l’UE ou dans un pays tiers mais seuls les Belges résidant dans un autre Etat Membre de l’UE peuvent se présenter comme candidats. En Belgique, une fois inscrits, tous les électeurs sont obligés de voter. Malgré les campagnes de sensibilisation menées par différentes institutions et des associations de la société civile lors des dernières élections, une difficulté majeure à laquelle restent confrontés les électeurs est le manque d’information concernant les procédures d’inscription et le processus politique de manière plus générale. Une manière d’encourager la participation politique des résidents non-belges serait de formaliser les stratégies de diffusion de l’information et de communiquer avec les nouveaux résidents dans différentes langues.
Year 2018
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
68 Report

Report on the political participation of mobile EU citizens: Romania

Authors Daniela Vintila, Simona Soare
Description
Odată cu aderarea României la Uniunea Europeană (UE), cetățenii UE cu domiciliul sau reședința în României au dreptul de a alege și de a fi aleși la alegerile locale și la alegerile pentru Parlamentul European desfășurate pe teritoriul României. Datorită faptului că românii din străinătate depășesc cu mult numărul cetățenilor UE rezidenți în România, dreptul de vot al cetăţenilor români cu domiciliul/reședința in străinătate a devenit, de altfel, o chestiune mult mai importantă în România. Cetățenii români din străinătate au dreptul de a vota la alegerile naționale și la alegerile pentru Parlamentul European, dar nu iși pot prezenta candidatura dacă nu au domiciliul in România. În general, nivelul de participarea electorală al cetățenilor UE rezidenţi pe teritoriul României și al cetățenilor români din străinătate la alegerile organizate în România este destul de scăzut. Implicarea lor electorală ar putea fi facilitată de măsuri precum: simplificarea procedurii de vot și de înscriere în listele electorale, precum și organizarea mai multor campanii de sensibilizare care să vizeze în mod specific cetățenii UE rezidenți pe teritoriul Romaniei și românii din străinătate.
Year 2018
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
69 Report

Human Rights and Substantive Equality in the Adjudication of Ethnic Practices

Authors Pier-Luc Dupont
Year 2016
Journal Name Nordic Journal of Human Rights
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
70 Journal Article

Speaking of Rights: The Influence of Law and Courts on the Making of Family Migration Policies in Germany

Authors Saskia Bonjour
Year 2016
Journal Name Law & Policy
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
71 Journal Article

Expulsion of EU citizens and the economy of EU citizenship and of the EU migration law

Principal investigator Sandra Mantu (co-Principal Investigator), Paul Minderhoud (co-Principal Investigator), Marie-Laure Basilien-Gainche ()
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
72 Project

Les Camps et le Droit

Principal investigator Marjorie Beuley (Co-Coordinator), Anne-Laure Chaumette (), Laurence Dubin (co-Coordinator), Marine Eudes (co-coordinator), Marie-Laure Basilien-Gainche (Investigator)
Description
Ce projet tend à donner une définition juridique des camps, à examiner leurs modes de gouvernance, à définir les normes juridiques qui s’y appliquent, et à examiner les régimes de responsabilité qui peuvent jouer.
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
73 Project

Territoires des mineurs en mobilités et normes juridiques

Principal investigator Nelly Robin (Principal Investigator), Philippe Lagrange (Investigator)
Description
Le projet a pour objectif de valoriser un patrimoine scientifique composé de récits de vie et de textes législatifs. À cette fin, l’équipe entend promouvoir une approche transversale, sciences sociales et sciences juridiques, autour d’un objet commun « les mineurs en mobilité ». Il s’agit de comprendre le rapport qu’ils entretiennent avec les événements consécutifs de l’application du droit au fil de leur parcours et le sens qu’ils leur attribuent. Dans ce cadre, la représentation cartographique est mobilisée pour interroger le droit comme élément de la géographie des migrations. Ces connaissances nouvelles visent aussi à favoriser le dialogue entre diverses institutions (scientifiques, gouvernementales et associatives) tant aux échelles locales (Poitiers, Paris) qu’à l’échelle internationale. Partenaires associés : MIGRINTER, CECOJI Centre d’études sur la coopération juridique internationale (EA 7353 univ. Poitiers), IDP Institut Droit Public (EA 2623 Univ. Poitiers), MIGREUROP, OSIWA Fondation Open Society, Association Hors la Rue.
Year 2015
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
76 Project

Regularisations and employment in Italy REGANE Assessment Report

Authors Martin Baldwin-Edwards, Francesca Zampagni
Year 2014
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
77 Working Paper

La traite des êtres humains saisie par les institutions. Une comparaison France/Allemagne

Principal investigator Mathilde Darley (Principal Investigator)
Description
La lutte contre la traite : entre gouvernement des frontières et régulation des sexualité Une politique et ses acteurs : comprendre les catégories institutionnelles à partir des pratiques des agents Dans un contexte international et national marqué par la multiplication des débats et des instruments visant la lutte contre la traite des femmes à des fins d’exploitation sexuelle, le projet ProsCrim s’est intéressé aux pratiques institutionnelles de qualification et de catégorisation des formes d’exploitation entourant l’exercice de la prostitution en France et en Allemagne. L’enquête visait notamment à éclairer les ressorts des catégories institutionnelles utilisées (et notamment celles de « victime » / « auteur » de traite des êtres humains). Pour ce faire, le dispositif méthodologique prévoyait à la fois une ethnographie des interactions entre les personnes en situation de prostitution et/ou de proxénétisme et les acteurs étatiques et non étatiques chargés de leur contrôle et de leur prise en charge (associations, acteurs policiers et judiciaires) ; et une ethnographie des arènes et acteurs ayant permis la constitution, la consolidation et la circulation de formes d’expertise sur la traite, et en particulier sur l’identification de ses « victimes ». Enfin, le projet se fixait comme objectif d’interroger, à travers la mise en perspective de deux régimes différenciés de régulation de la prostitution (réglementariste en Allemagne et abolitionniste en France), le poids du cadre légal sur les pratiques de catégorisation mises en œuvre localement.
Year 2014
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
78 Project

Regularisations and employment in Spain. REGANE Assessment Report

Authors Martin Baldwin-Edwards
Year 2014
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
79 Working Paper

A proper wife, a proper marriage: Constructions of ‘us’ and ‘them’ in Dutch family migration policy

Authors Saskia Bonjour, Betty de Hart
Year 2013
Journal Name European Journal of Women's Studies
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
80 Journal Article

Immigration Policies in Comparison

Principal investigator Helbling Marc (Principal Investigator)
Description
Over the last two decades both immigration politics and research on immigration issues have become very important. So far, there is however no dataset that would allow researchers to systematically investigate immigration policies across a large sample of countries. The aim of the Immigration Policies in Comparison (IMPIC) project is therefore to provide a set of sophisticated quantitative indices to measure immigration policies in all OECD countries and for the time period 1980-2010. By means of this new dataset the causes and effects of immigration policies will be studied more systematically.
Year 2011
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
81 Project

EC Readmission Agreements: A Re-evaluation of the Political Impasse

Authors Annabelle Roig, Thomas Huddleston
Year 2007
Journal Name European Journal of Migration and Law
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
82 Journal Article

Observatoire des Migrations Internationales ouest-africaines au service d'une coopération renouvelée entre l'Afrique de l'Ouest et l'Union Européenne

Principal investigator Nelly Robin (Coordinator)
Description
Le programme OMAE est financé par la Commission Européenne (Programme AENAS : assistance technique et financière en faveur des pays tiers dans le domaine des migrations et de l’asile, l’Europ Aid Office de coopération. Ce projet rassemble des chercheurs et des experts de plusieurs disciplines (démographie, droit, géographie, informatique, sociologie) originaires d’Afrique et d’Europe. Il vise principalement à favoriser une connaissance des migrations internationales en Afrique de l’Ouest et apprécier leur récente évolution, à partir du Sud (nouvelles routes, nouveaux acteurs, nouvelles politiques), à aider à la valorisation et au partage des résultats, notamment pour la définition de politiques publiques et pour ouvrir la voie à une action concertée entre la CEDEAO et l’Union Européenne. Les résultats obtenus au Sénégal dans le cadre de la mise en œuvre de l’Observatoire des migrations internationales ont suscité l’intérêt des scientifiques et des institutionnels et ont incité à l’élargissement du dispositif à d’autres pays de l’Afrique de l’ouest : la Côte d’Ivoire, le Ghana, le Mali, la Mauritanie, le Niger, et le Nigeria. Ainsi l’initiative menée au Sénégal, d’envergure nationale, prend une dimension sous-régionale et s’ouvre au monde anglophone. Ce projet se décline selon trois axes principaux : l’inventaire, la collecte, la diffusion et l’analyse des textes législatifs qui organisent et structurent les modalités du contrôle et de la gestion des populations migrantes dans l’espace CEDEAO, la définition des modalités d’adaptation de l’expérience menée au Sénégal depuis 2002 aux réalités des autres pays ouest-africains du programme, pour la collecte et l’analyse statistique et cartographique des données administratives, la réalisation d’enquêtes sociodémographiques dans différents pays du programme sur deux thèmes : les migrants en transit « en panne » et la frontière à géométrie variable. L’IRD assure la coordination du programme et les institutions partenaires sont le Club du Sahel/OCDE, le CRER de l’Université de Warwick et l’université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar.
Year 2007
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
83 Project

Observatoire des Migrations Internationales ouest-africaines au service d'une coopération renouvelée entre l'Afrique de l'Ouest et l'Union Européenne

Principal investigator Nelly Robin (Coordinator)
Description
Le programme OMAE est financé par la Commission Européenne (Programme AENAS : assistance technique et financière en faveur des pays tiers dans le domaine des migrations et de l’asile, l’Europ Aid Office de coopération. Ce projet rassemble des chercheurs et des experts de plusieurs disciplines (démographie, droit, géographie, informatique, sociologie) originaires d’Afrique et d’Europe. Il vise principalement à favoriser une connaissance des migrations internationales en Afrique de l’Ouest et apprécier leur récente évolution, à partir du Sud (nouvelles routes, nouveaux acteurs, nouvelles politiques), à aider à la valorisation et au partage des résultats, notamment pour la définition de politiques publiques et pour ouvrir la voie à une action concertée entre la CEDEAO et l’Union Européenne. Les résultats obtenus au Sénégal dans le cadre de la mise en œuvre de l’Observatoire des migrations internationales ont suscité l’intérêt des scientifiques et des institutionnels et ont incité à l’élargissement du dispositif à d’autres pays de l’Afrique de l’ouest : la Côte d’Ivoire, le Ghana, le Mali, la Mauritanie, le Niger, et le Nigeria. Ainsi l’initiative menée au Sénégal, d’envergure nationale, prend une dimension sous-régionale et s’ouvre au monde anglophone. Ce projet se décline selon trois axes principaux : l’inventaire, la collecte, la diffusion et l’analyse des textes législatifs qui organisent et structurent les modalités du contrôle et de la gestion des populations migrantes dans l’espace CEDEAO, la définition des modalités d’adaptation de l’expérience menée au Sénégal depuis 2002 aux réalités des autres pays ouest-africains du programme, pour la collecte et l’analyse statistique et cartographique des données administratives, la réalisation d’enquêtes sociodémographiques dans différents pays du programme sur deux thèmes : les migrants en transit « en panne » et la frontière à géométrie variable. L’IRD assure la coordination du programme et les institutions partenaires sont le Club du Sahel/OCDE, le CRER de l’Université de Warwick et l’université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar.
Year 2007
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
84 Project
SHOW FILTERS
Ask us