Research
Database

This constantly growing database accumulates and structures
relevant knowledge in the field of migration.

Showing page of 162,786 results, sorted by

Representing the “European refugee crisis” in Germany and beyond: Deservingness and difference, life and death

Authors SETH M. HOLMES, HEIDE CASTAÑEDA
Year 2016
Journal Name American Ethnologist
Citations (WoS) 124
32651 Journal Article

Birthplaces, migration and identity in the 2001 census for Ukraine

Authors Gunnar Thorvaldsen
Year 2016
Journal Name HISTORY OF THE FAMILY
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32652 Journal Article

Immigration, the Celtic Tiger and the economic crisis

Authors Bryan Fanning
Year 2016
Journal Name Irish Studies Review
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32653 Journal Article

Solidarisierung in Europa: Migrant*innen und Osteuropäer*innen und deren Engagement für Geflüchtete

Principal investigator Madalena Nowicka (Principal Investigator)
Description
"Das Teilprojekt wird im Rahmen des BIM-Forschungs-Interventions-Cluster ""Solidarität im Wandel?"" durchgeführt, das durch die Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Migration, Flüchtlinge und Integration gefördert wird. Das Projekt untersucht exemplarisch am Beispiel polnischstämmiger, in Deutschland lebender Frauen, wie sich Migrant*innen aus Osteuropa für Geflüchtete engagieren, was sie dazu motiviert und welche Werteeinstellungen diesem Engagement zugrunde liegen. Diese Fragen interessieren vor allem im Kontext der Solidarisierung in Europa und der kontrastierenden Positionen osteuropäischer EU-Mitgliedstaaten, die sich gegen die Aufnahme von Geflüchteten aussprechen. Diese Positionen gehen mit einer vergleichsweise hohen Fremdenfeindlichkeit und Nationalisierung der Bevölkerung in Osteuropa einher. Bisherige Forschungsergebnisse zeigen diesbezüglich, dass Migrantinnen aus Polen häufig in der Arbeit mit Geflüchteten in Deutschland engagiert sind, obwohl sie in Polen nie aktiv gewesen sind. Diese Einstellung „erlernen“ sie vielmehr nach der Migration. Durch den Vergleich der Ergebnisse dieser Studie mit Umfragen in Polen sollen die Auswirkungen der Migration auf ehrenamtliches Engagement nun bestimmt werden. Da die Migrant*innen soziale Netzwerke in das Herkunftsland pflegen, kann eine Änderung von Werten und Einstellungen auch auf Nicht-Migrant*innen wirken. Auch durch ihr Wahlverhalten in Deutschland und Polen können Migrant*innen die Prozesse der Solidarisierung in Europa beeinflussen."
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32656 Project

Digital Crossings in Europe: Gender, Diaspora and Belonging

Description
Many immigrants enter Europe both legally and illegally every year. This creates multiple challenges for the Union, including the gender and ethnic segregation of migrant groups, especially women. While it strives for an inclusive and integrated society as envisioned by the EU motto ‘Unity in Diversity’, it is still often perceived more as ‘Fortress Europe.’ This project focuses on the ‘connected migrant’, studying how virtual communities of migrants, or digital diasporas, convey issues of technology, migration, globalisation, alienation and belonging capturing the lives of migrants in their interaction with multiple worlds and media. More specifically, it will investigate whether digital technologies enhance European integration or foster gender and ethnic segregation, and, if so, how. Using a multi-layered and cutting-edge approach that draws from the humanities, social science and new media studies (i.e. internet studies and mobile media), this research considers: 1. How migration and digital technologies enable digital diasporas (Somali, Turkish, Romanian) and the impact these have on identity, gender and belonging in European urban centres; 2. How these entanglements are connected to and perceived from outside Europe by focusing on transnational ties; and 3. How digital connections create new possibilities for cosmopolitan outlooks, rearticulating Europe’s motto of ‘Unity in Diversity.’ The outcomes of this work will be innovative at three levels. a) Empirically, the project gathers, maps and critically grounds online behaviour by migrant women from a European comparative perspective. b) Methodologically, it breaks new ground by developing new methods of analysis for digital diasporas contributing to the development of ‘postcolonial’ digital humanities. c) Conceptually, it integrates colonial and migrant relations into the idea of Europe, elaborating on the notion of cosmopolitan belonging through virtual connectivity.
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32657 Project

Transnationale Mobilität und soziale Positionen in der Europäischen Union

Principal investigator Thomas Faist (Principal Investigator)
Description
Grenzüberschreitende Mobilität wird häufig als zentraler Faktor für die Verbesserung von Lebenschancen angesehen. Dementsprechend hat in den letzten Jahren die Forschung zu den Auswirkungen der Freizügigkeit innerhalb der Europäischen Union auf die Lebenschancen mobiler Bevölkerungsgruppen zugenommen. Ein Ergebnis dieser Studien lautet, dass nicht alle MigrantInnen in gleicher Weise von den Möglichkeiten der Mobilität profitieren. Diese Unterschiede werden überwiegend auf Heterogenitäten, wie etwa den Rechtsstatus, Geschlecht, Ethnizität und Klasse zurückgeführt. Die vorliegende Forschung zu diesem Thema konzentriert sich dabei besonders auf benachteiligte oder bevorzugte Gruppen, supranationale Sozialpolitik oder Lebenslagen von MigrantInnen im Herkunfts- bzw. im Ankunftsland. Daraus ergibt sich eine Forschungslücke in Bezug auf die allgemeine Frage, wie räumliche Mobilität innerhalb des Sozialraums EU im Zusammenspiel mit anderen Heterogenitäten die soziale Position beeinflusst. Mit sozialer Position ist ein objektiver wie auch subjektiver sozioökonomischer Status gemeint. Darüber hinaus ist nicht bekannt, wie MigrantInnen sich in der Sozialstruktur der EU verorten. Das Zusammenspiel zwischen objektiven und subjektiven sozialen Positionen wird vor allem durch den Mechanismus des sozialen Vergleichs entlang unterschiedlicher Referenzrahmen bestimmt. Potenziell nutzen MigrantInnen sowohl nationale als auch transnationale Referenzrahmen für ihre subjektive Positionierung. Das Projekt setzt an dieser Stelle an und beschäftigt sich mit drei Forschungsschwerpunkten: (1) der Analyse räumlicher Mobilitätsverläufe von MigrantInnengruppen, die durch verschiedene Heterogenitäten gekennzeichnet sind; (2) dem Zusammenhang von räumlichen Mobilitätsverläufen und der sozialen Position in Bezug auf den sozio-ökonomischen Status und dessen subjektive Wahrnehmung und Bewertung; und (3) der Untersuchung des sozialen Vergleichs als Mechanismus, der die subjektive Wahrnehmung der sozialen Position beeinflusst. Im Vordergrund steht dabei die Untersuchung der Selektion von Referenzrahmen und -gruppen für soziale Vergleiche von MigrantInnen. Das sequenzielle, mixed methods-Design des Forschungsprojekts greift dazu auf Daten der IAB-SOEP-Migrantenstichprobe zurück, um typische Mobilitätsverläufe von MigrantInnen in Deutschland, sowie ihren sozio-ökonomischen Status und ihre Lebens- und Bereichszufriedenheit mit quantitativen Methoden zu analysieren. Darauf aufbauend werden qualitative Interviews mit einer Teilstichprobe der IAB-SOEP-Befragten, sowie mit Personen ohne Migrationserfahrung in einem Land der EU mit hohen Emigrationsquoten (Polen), durchgeführt. Diese erlauben eine Analyse der Bedeutung räumlicher Mobilität für die subjektive soziale Position von mobilen und nichtmobilen Bevölkerungsgruppen. Ziel des Projekts ist es, den Mechanismus des sozialen Vergleichs zu untersuchen, um den Zusammenhang zwischen räumlicher Mobilität und sozialen Positionen zu erhellen.
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32659 Project

Greece Policy Brief: Addressing Migration Challenges beyond the Current Humanitarian Crisis

Authors Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32661 Policy Brief

International migration in Luxembourg. Continuous Reporting System on Migration OECD – 2016

Authors Birte Nienaber, Sarah Jacobs, Adolfo Sommarribas, ...
Description
Luxembourg has been a country of immigration for more than 50 years. Located in the heart of Europe, it holds a strong attraction for EU citizens and nationals from countries all around the world, who play a central role in the national economy, making an important contribution to the population growth and the labour market. Over the course of 2015, Luxembourg’s population has continued its steady growth of approximately 13.000 people per year, increasing by 2,36%, from 562.958 on 1st January 2015 to 576.249 on 1st January 2016. Foreign citizens have continued to play an essential role in Luxembourg’s population growth, both in terms of net migration and births. The total net migration amounted to +11.159 individuals in 2015, which signifies a surplus of arrivals over departures. Foreign EU citizens accounted for 76,1%; third-country nationals represented 32,9%, while Luxembourgish nationals’ contribution was negative, at -9%. The number of births in 2015 was the highest on record, equal to that in 2013, with 6.115 births in total. Foreigners contributed a birth surplus of 2.150 to Luxembourg’s natural increase, while a birth deficit of -18 was recorded for Luxembourgish nationals. 2015 also marked a record year regarding naturalisations, with Belgians remaining the citizens that obtain citizenship most frequently, followed by the French and the Portuguese. On 1st January 2016, 46,7% of Luxembourg’s residents were foreigners. Representing 34,6% of the total foreign population, Portuguese remained the most represented nationality, followed by France (15,5%) and Italy (7,5%), while the most numerous third-country nationals were Montenegrins. Due to the war in Syria and the influx of applicants for international protection that followed, the Syrian population living in Luxembourg showed the highest proportional increase during 2015, growing by 461,5% from January 2015 to January 2016. A look at Luxembourg’s labour market also reveals the central role that foreigners play in the national economy. In the first quarter of 2016, residents of Luxembourg represented 55% of the country’s salaried workforce. Of these, 27,5% were Luxembourgish nationals, while EU nationals represented 24,2% and third-country nationals 3,3%. Cross-border workers from France, Belgium and Germany represented 45% of all salaried workers in Luxembourg. They mainly work in the manufacturing industries, construction and commerce. A majority of recruitments in the HORECA sector are of foreign residents. Third-country nationals who do not benefit from free movement must be issued with a residence permit in order to enter Luxembourg. An increase in first issues of residence permits was recorded for most categories compared to the preceding year, which had experienced a decrease in almost all categories. In 2015, residence permits were most frequently issued in the “family member”, “salaried worker” and “European Blue Card” categories. 2015 was marked by a significant increase in the number of applications for international protection, which has more than doubled when compared to 2014 (2.447 applications in 2015). While there was a strong increase at the end of 2015, the trend slowed down in 2016. Nonetheless, the number of applications for international protection remains higher than levels in 2013/2014. Most applications were from Syrians and Iraqis (27,3% and 22% respectively), who accounted for only 9% and 1% respectively in 2014. Moreover, both the rate of status recognition (refugee and subsidiary protection status) and of return decision increased. In 2015, Luxembourg pledged to relocate 557 individuals to Luxembourg in the framework of the EU Council decision to relocate 160.000 international protection applicants from Greece and Italy. Within this framework, 114 refugees have been relocated from Greece and 20 from Italy up until mid-August 2016. Furthermore, 46 refugees were resettled from Turkey in 2015, followed by 52 further refugees as a result of Luxembourg’s pledge to resettle 194 refugees from Turkey in the context of the EU-Turkey agreement of March 2016. Additionally, 44 Syrians were welcomed in 2015 following a request for assistance by German authorities. Faced with the increased inflow of applicants for international protection, an emergency reception plan was developed in 2015. The plan included the establishment of first-instance reception centres and the strengthening of the capacity in human resources of both the Luxembourg Reception and Integration Agency (OLAI) and the Directorate of Immigration, which is under the authority of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. The OLAI also strengthened the collaboration with stakeholders at inter-ministerial and local levels. A strong focus has also been put on integration, where major developments include the setting up of integration projects by the municipalities in the context of the ‘Communal Integration Plan’ project and the creation of Luxembourg’s Centre for Integration and Cohesion (LISKO), a service supporting the beneficiaries of international protection in their process of integration in Luxembourgish society. Over the course of 2015 and 2016, Luxembourg continued to transpose and implement several EU directives. The law of 18th December 2015 on the reception of applicants for international protection and temporary protection transposes Directive 2013/33/EU (re-cast reception conditions) into national law. The law of 18th December 2015 on international protection and temporary protection transposed Directive 2013/32/EU (re-cast procedure), establishing the procedures for granting and withdrawing international and subsidiary protection and the standardisation of the content of this protection. The bill implementing Directive 2013/55/EU on the recognition of professional qualifications was introduced into parliament in 2015 and the bill implementing Directive 2014/36/EU on seasonal workers and Directive 2014/66/EU on intra-corporate transferees and investors’ residence permits was introduced in 2016. Regarding the transposition of the Blue Card Directive, a Government Decree was issued on 22nd May 2015 establishing the professions to which the lower salary threshold for hiring highly qualified workers applies. On the national level, a number of legislative changes address some of the challenges set by Luxembourg’s heterogeneity. The bill no. 6410 on youth, introduced into parliament on 6th February 2015, gives cross-border workers access to the care service voucher system which was previously only available to Luxembourgish residents. Bill no. 6893 on the recognition of qualifications was introduced in parliament in October 2015. At the referendum of 7th June 2015, the proposal to extend the right to vote of non-Luxembourgish residents was rejected by a large majority, who argued in favour of the acquisition of nationality as the more appropriate way to acquire the right to vote. Consequently, the government took steps towards reforming the law on nationality in order to soften the requirements for acquisition of nationality, and in this way enable the broadening of participation in elections. Bill no. 6977 on nationality was introduced in parliament on 24th March 2016. It includes the reduction of the required duration of residency from seven to five years and the reintroduction of procedure of option in cases of close links with Luxembourg. The level of fluency in Luxembourgish required has become a central focus of the debate on the bill on nationality, some fearing that linguistic requirements would become an obstacle to foreigners’ acquisition of nationality, others underlining the command of the language as a central factor in integration and thus also in the acquisition of nationality.
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32662 Report

Juxtaposing Pakistani diaspora policy with migrants’ transnational citizenship practices

Authors Marta Bivand Erdal
Year 2016
Journal Name Geoforum
Citations (WoS) 5
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32663 Journal Article

The measure of migratory flows between France and other countries; what if we also spoke of emigration?

Authors Franck Temporal, Chantal Brutel
Year 2016
Journal Name Revue européenne des migrations internationales
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32664 Journal Article

Humanitarian Protection for Children Fleeing Gang-Based Violence in the Americas

Authors Elizabeth Carlson, Anna Marie Gallagher
Year 2015
Journal Name Journal on Migration and Human Security
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32665 Journal Article

Multi‐sited accumulation of capital: Cape Verdean returnees and small‐scale business

Authors LISA ÅKESSON
Year 2015
Journal Name Global Networks
32669 Journal Article

Postcolonial migrations and diasporic linkages between Latin America and Japan and Spain

Authors Rosalia Avila-Tàpies, Josefina Domínguez-Mujica
Year 2015
Journal Name ASIAN AND PACIFIC MIGRATION JOURNAL
32670 Journal Article

Turkish and Chinese immigration to the Netherlands : corridor report

Authors Jérémy MANDIN, Sonia GSIR
Description
This report compares two quite different corridor migrations to the Netherlands. Turkish immigration is larger and more recent than Chinese immigration, which goes back to the beginning of the 20th century. The report aims to better understand the variation in several dimensions of Turkish and Chinese immigrants’ integration – in particular, the labour market, education and citizenship. It is based on an original methodology combining different data sources (the existing literature, an analysis of the legal and political frameworks, a quantitative analysis, and a survey). It aims to test the INTERACT project’s main hypothesis which conceives of integration as a three-way process. This report provides insight on the integration policy developed in the Netherlands (ethnic minorities policies) and links it to Turkish and Chinese diaspora policies. It tries to shed light on the impact that Turkey and China may have on the integration of their diasporas in the Netherlands. The main findings are the following: firstly, the countries of origin are concerned about their migrants abroad and develop policies accordingly. Secondly, Turkish and Chinese migrants’ integration in the Netherlands present different characteristics and the interaction between the Dutch integration policy and their respective diaspora policies is a complex one. Thirdly, the impact that Turkey and China have on integration is different with regard to the different dimensions of integration. And finally, non-state actors based in the countries of origin may also have a significant impact on migrants’ integration.
Year 2015
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32676 Report

'If you jump up and down, Balotelli dies'(1): Racism and player abuse in Italian football

Authors Mark Doidge
Year 2015
Journal Name International Review for the Sociology of Sport
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32677 Journal Article

Corridor report on the United Kingdom : the immigration, emigration and diaspora policies' effects on integration : Chinese and Indian migrants in the UK

Authors Anne UNTERREINER
Description
This paper presents the first results of the INTERACT project on Chinese and Indian migrants in the United Kingdom (UK). It is based on the data gathered by the project using a mixed method of data collection and analysis. We identify the policies of the states of origin (India and China) and destination (the UK), their implementation and their impact on migrants’ integration paths in the UK. In this paper, we first present an overview of the evolution of Chinese and Indian migration flows to the UK, and then present the current policy frameworks at both destination and origin, before analysing how they affect the integration trends of Chinese and Indian migrants in the UK. Even though contemporary Indian migrants – and to an even greater extent, Chinese migrants – living in the UK are highly skilled migrants, they do not automatically integrate into British society. Although Chinese migrants are better educated than Indian migrants, fewer hold a British passport, and more are unemployed. The position of Chinese and Indian migrants in British society seems to be the consequence of the combination of the origin and destination countries’ policies. These policies indeed influence current and past migration flows, namely through entry conditions to the UK, and exit policies at origin. In addition, both the year of arrival and the duration of stay impact migrants’ integration. Since the migration flows from India are older than those from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Indian migrants speak better English than Chinese migrants and more often own a home, hold a British passport and identify as British. State policies at destination and origin also affect the way that migrant communities are organized and integrated into mainstream society. Chinese migrants, who in recent years have mainly been students, have more connections with the PRC than Indian migrants do with their state of origin since new Chinese civil society organisations based in the UK have close ties with the Chinese State. These associations are also aware of Chinese migrants’ potential difficulties with integration, and thus try to counterbalance it. Destination and origin policies can thus affect migrants’ opportunity structures differently over time and have both a direct and indirect effect on migrant integration in the long run.
Year 2015
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32678 Report

A CULTURE OF MIXEDNESS IN A NATIONAL AND MIGRATION CONTEXT

Authors Mirjam Milharcic Hladnik
Year 2015
Journal Name ANNALES-ANALI ZA ISTRSKE IN MEDITERANSKE STUDIJE-SERIES HISTORIA ET SOCIOLOGIA
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32682 Journal Article

Black Protestants in a Catholic Land The AME Church in the Dominican Republic 1899-1916

Authors Christina Cecelia Davidson
Year 2015
Journal Name NWIG-NEW WEST INDIAN GUIDE-NIEUWE WEST-INDISCHE GIDS
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32683 Journal Article

From Migrants to Exiles: the Spanish Civil War and the Spanish Immigrant Communities in the United States

Authors Ana Varela-Lago
Year 2015
Journal Name CAMINO REAL-ESTUDIOS DE LAS HISPANIDADES NORTEAMERICANAS
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32684 Journal Article

Cubans in the United States and Spain: The Diaspora Generational Divide

Authors Susan Eckstein, Mette Louise Berg
Year 2015
Journal Name Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32685 Journal Article

The Newest Polish New Yorkers: A Social and Demographic Profile

Year 2015
Journal Name Studia Migracyjne - Przegląd Polonijny
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32686 Journal Article

Migration, religion and work in comparative perspective. Evangelical ‘ethnic churches’ in Southern Europe

Description
How do Evangelical migrants use religion and church-related networks to seek employment, pursue social mobility, construct respectability and resist racism? How do Evangelical churches become ‘brokers’ of socio-economic integration of their members thus stakeholders in immigration countries? These are the main questions that this project seeks to answer. MIGRANTCHRISTIANITY investigates how migrant men and women from Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America make use of a minority religion in negotiating their social and economic integration in Europe. The project focuses on Ghanaian and Ecuadorian migrants in Italy and Spain. I investigate how migrants develop strategies of integration through the Evangelical churches and how such strategies are shaped by ethnicity, class, gender and age. I also look at how Evangelical churches act as ‘brokers’ of integration, in relation to employment but also with reference to a wider social positioning of the migrant as a ‘minority Christian’. In doing so, the research contributes to our understanding of the role of religion in migrants’ integration or marginalisation and of how migration is reconfiguring the Italian and Spanish societies through the production of new understandings of Christianity: these churches challenge the Catholic majority religion as well as dominant views of migrant religion as Islam only. The MIGRANTCHRISTIANITY project brings together two hitherto separate strands of research: that on migrant labour and ethnicity on the one hand, and that on migration and religion, more specifically on migration-driven Evangelical churches, on the other.
Year 2015
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32688 Project

Socialist Mobilities: Crossing New Terrains in Vietnamese Migration Histories

Year 2015
Journal Name Central and Eastern European Migration Review
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32689 Journal Article

Mussolini’s Mobilities

Authors Matteo Pretelli
Year 2015
Journal Name Journal of Migration History
32690 Journal Article

The Religious Aspects of Diasporic Experience of Muslims in Europe within the Crisis of Multiculturalism

Authors Driss Habti
Year 2014
Journal Name Policy Futures in Education
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32691 Journal Article

“Enemy Territory”: Immigration Enforcement in the US-Mexico Borderlands

Authors Walter A. Ewing
Year 2014
Journal Name Journal on Migration and Human Security
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32692 Journal Article

Diaspora Institutions and Diaspora Governance

Authors Alan Gamlen
Year 2014
Journal Name International Migration Review
Citations (WoS) 62
32693 Journal Article

Forced Migrants or Voluntary Exiles: Ethnic Turks of Bulgaria in Turkey

Authors Cem Dişbudak, Semra Purkis
Year 2014
Journal Name JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION AND INTEGRATION
32697 Journal Article

Emigration and diaspora policies in Belarus

Authors Andrei YELISEYEU
Description
In the first half of the 1990s, Belarus saw large migration flows, which since then have become considerably more moderate. The main destination countries for Belarusian emigrants are Russia, Poland, Germany, the US, and Canada. Over the last decade, temporary labour migration of Belarusians to the European Union has remained rather limited. At the same time labour migration flows of Belarusians towards Russia have increased. Belarus is a highly centralized state with regional authorities playing a marginal role in elaborating state policies, including in emigration matters. In order to curb emigration, Belarus authorities have resorted to the adoption of laws that discourage mobility. Taking into account growing labour shortages, the state policy to attract immigrants has been largely ineffective. At the same time, by September 2014 Belarus had reportedly hosted more than 25,000 Ukrainian migrants as a result of the military conflict in the Donbass region. Diaspora policy in Belarus is largely incoherent and selective. The long-awaited diaspora law is set to be adopted soon, but it fails to take into account the aspirations of diaspora members.
Year 2014
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32698 Report

Policy and institutional frameworks : country report Serbia

Authors Vladimir PETRONIJEVIC
Description
In Serbia, migration, and particularly labour migration, has been of little importance to state institutions and the public. However, migration management has become important in the context of European integration. Unfortunately, Serbia still lacks independent migration studies at its universities. The lack of interest among the Serbian academic community has been reflected in a muddled national policy approach towards Serbian emigration and the diaspora. Although there have been improvements in the legal and strategic framework, the implementation of these acts and the results of these policies are still missing. In 2009, as part of the visa liberalisation between Serbia and the EU, the Serbian Government adopted the Migration Management Strategy. The Migration Management Strategy was followed by the Law on Migration Management, adopted in November 2012. The public debate in Serbia is now more focused on obstacles related to the recognition of foreign diplomas. Highly-skilled returnees are faced with very expensive and long procedures for diploma recognition. Although readmission has become very important during the EU integration process, returnees are still faced with obstacles in the reintegration process.
Year 2014
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32699 Report

The economics of international migration: A short history of the debate

Authors Timothy J. Hatton
Year 2014
Journal Name LABOUR ECONOMICS
32700 Journal Article
SHOW FILTERS
Ask us