Research
Database

This constantly growing database accumulates and structures
relevant knowledge in the field of migration.

Showing page of 162,551 results, sorted by

Country of Origin Effects and Impacts on Educational Attainment of Pupils with Migrant Backgrounds. Towards a New Research Agenda

Year 2017
Book Title Migrant Integration Between Homeland and Host Society Volume 1
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32601 Book Chapter

Immigration, regional conditions, and crime: Evidence from an allocation policy in Germany

Authors Marc Piopiunik, Jens Ruhose
Year 2017
Journal Name European Economic Review
Citations (WoS) 6
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32602 Journal Article

Connection without Engagement: Paradoxes of North American Armenian Return Migration

Authors Daniel Fittante
Year 2017
Journal Name Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32605 Journal Article

La inmigración en el ojo del huracán». Anuario CIDOB de la Inmigración 2017

Description
Sin olvidar la crisis de los refugiados en Europa, la edición 2017 del Anuario hace un balance del auge de los populismos y su discurso frente al fenómeno de la inmigración. Efectivamente, un año más la inmigración se encuentra en el ojo del huracán en Europa y fuera de ella. Y ello tanto por la ingente suma de tragedias y horrores humanitarios de los que son víctimas cientos de miles de migrantes y refugiados, como por los diversos ataques y manifestaciones de rechazo de que es objeto la inmigración por parte de partidos y movimientos populistas de extrema derecha. Asimismo, se sigue analizando la situación de la inmigración en España y en Europa.
Year 2017
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32606 Report

(Nie) widzialni mieszkańcy. Dyskurs o imigrantach i roli miastaw ich wspieraniu na przykładzie Poznania

Year 2017
Journal Name Studia Migracyjne - Przegląd Polonijny
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32608 Journal Article

The impact of foreign accent on social interaction and cognitive processes.

Description
‘Ants don’t sleep’. One would think that this sentence should be assessed as equally true (or false) independently of the speaker’s accent. It is not the case. Overall, speakers with a foreign accent (FA) are judged as less trustworthy, less educated, less intelligent and less competent than native speakers. This negative bias towards foreign-accented speakers (thereafter, FA bias) has critical consequences on many aspects of everyday life (e.g., job discrimination). Given the migration flow in Europe, it is crucial to understand the impact FA bias has on social interaction. This negative bias seems to have different origins: linguistic (FA is more difficult to understand than native accent, thus, it reduces ‘processing fluency’), and social (FA triggers a rapid categorisation of the speaker as out-group). The project will investigate 1) how FA bias affects cognitive processes, and 2) the modulation of the FA bias by social stereotypes and its consequences in the brain. The project is innovative as it examines the real-time impact of FA on cognitive processes using event-related potentials, a technique that allows recording online brain activity. The proposed experiments involve native listeners and non-native speakers with a medium FA. The findings will be of interest for many fields like linguistics, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and to some extent for other social disciplines (law, education, health). They will also be relevant for social institutions (Council of Europe) and services for immigrants (Linguistic Integration of Adult Migrants). The outcome of the project will be useful to generate solutions to reduce this social bias. Moreover, the project fits well with the current interest of the ERA, being in line with FP7 funded projects like ‘European Multilingual Experience’. Finally, Prof. Hartsuiker’s laboratory (Ghent University, Belgium) in which speech processing and bilingualism are investigated provides a perfect scientific environment.
Year 2017
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32609 Project

Die Illegitimen. Grenz- und Migrationsregime in biopolitischer Perspektive

Authors Michaela Ralser
Year 2016
Journal Name Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32611 Journal Article

Tamaulipas' migrant smugglers employed by U.S. farmers

Authors Simon Pedro Izcara Palacios, Karla Lorena Andrade Rubio
Year 2016
Journal Name NOESIS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES Y HUMANIDADES
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32616 Journal Article

Refugees and Refugee Protection in the Early Modern Period

Authors Susanne Lachenicht
Year 2016
Journal Name JOURNAL OF REFUGEE STUDIES
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32619 Journal Article

A Web of Repatriation: The Changing Politics of Israel's Diaspora Strategy

Year 2016
Journal Name Population, Space and Place
Citations (WoS) 7
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32620 Journal Article

The Impact of the Recent Economic Crisis on Unemployment Among Immigrants in Japan

Authors Hirohisa Takenoshita
Year 2016
Journal Name JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION AND INTEGRATION
32622 Journal Article

Editorial

Authors Hannes Krämer, Larissa Schindler
Year 2016
Journal Name Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32623 Journal Article

Representing the “European refugee crisis” in Germany and beyond: Deservingness and difference, life and death

Authors SETH M. HOLMES, HEIDE CASTAÑEDA
Year 2016
Journal Name American Ethnologist
Citations (WoS) 124
32625 Journal Article

Birthplaces, migration and identity in the 2001 census for Ukraine

Authors Gunnar Thorvaldsen
Year 2016
Journal Name HISTORY OF THE FAMILY
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32626 Journal Article

Immigration, the Celtic Tiger and the economic crisis

Authors Bryan Fanning
Year 2016
Journal Name Irish Studies Review
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32627 Journal Article

Solidarisierung in Europa: Migrant*innen und Osteuropäer*innen und deren Engagement für Geflüchtete

Principal investigator Madalena Nowicka (Principal Investigator)
Description
"Das Teilprojekt wird im Rahmen des BIM-Forschungs-Interventions-Cluster ""Solidarität im Wandel?"" durchgeführt, das durch die Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Migration, Flüchtlinge und Integration gefördert wird. Das Projekt untersucht exemplarisch am Beispiel polnischstämmiger, in Deutschland lebender Frauen, wie sich Migrant*innen aus Osteuropa für Geflüchtete engagieren, was sie dazu motiviert und welche Werteeinstellungen diesem Engagement zugrunde liegen. Diese Fragen interessieren vor allem im Kontext der Solidarisierung in Europa und der kontrastierenden Positionen osteuropäischer EU-Mitgliedstaaten, die sich gegen die Aufnahme von Geflüchteten aussprechen. Diese Positionen gehen mit einer vergleichsweise hohen Fremdenfeindlichkeit und Nationalisierung der Bevölkerung in Osteuropa einher. Bisherige Forschungsergebnisse zeigen diesbezüglich, dass Migrantinnen aus Polen häufig in der Arbeit mit Geflüchteten in Deutschland engagiert sind, obwohl sie in Polen nie aktiv gewesen sind. Diese Einstellung „erlernen“ sie vielmehr nach der Migration. Durch den Vergleich der Ergebnisse dieser Studie mit Umfragen in Polen sollen die Auswirkungen der Migration auf ehrenamtliches Engagement nun bestimmt werden. Da die Migrant*innen soziale Netzwerke in das Herkunftsland pflegen, kann eine Änderung von Werten und Einstellungen auch auf Nicht-Migrant*innen wirken. Auch durch ihr Wahlverhalten in Deutschland und Polen können Migrant*innen die Prozesse der Solidarisierung in Europa beeinflussen."
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32630 Project

Digital Crossings in Europe: Gender, Diaspora and Belonging

Description
Many immigrants enter Europe both legally and illegally every year. This creates multiple challenges for the Union, including the gender and ethnic segregation of migrant groups, especially women. While it strives for an inclusive and integrated society as envisioned by the EU motto ‘Unity in Diversity’, it is still often perceived more as ‘Fortress Europe.’ This project focuses on the ‘connected migrant’, studying how virtual communities of migrants, or digital diasporas, convey issues of technology, migration, globalisation, alienation and belonging capturing the lives of migrants in their interaction with multiple worlds and media. More specifically, it will investigate whether digital technologies enhance European integration or foster gender and ethnic segregation, and, if so, how. Using a multi-layered and cutting-edge approach that draws from the humanities, social science and new media studies (i.e. internet studies and mobile media), this research considers: 1. How migration and digital technologies enable digital diasporas (Somali, Turkish, Romanian) and the impact these have on identity, gender and belonging in European urban centres; 2. How these entanglements are connected to and perceived from outside Europe by focusing on transnational ties; and 3. How digital connections create new possibilities for cosmopolitan outlooks, rearticulating Europe’s motto of ‘Unity in Diversity.’ The outcomes of this work will be innovative at three levels. a) Empirically, the project gathers, maps and critically grounds online behaviour by migrant women from a European comparative perspective. b) Methodologically, it breaks new ground by developing new methods of analysis for digital diasporas contributing to the development of ‘postcolonial’ digital humanities. c) Conceptually, it integrates colonial and migrant relations into the idea of Europe, elaborating on the notion of cosmopolitan belonging through virtual connectivity.
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32631 Project

Transnationale Mobilität und soziale Positionen in der Europäischen Union

Principal investigator Thomas Faist (Principal Investigator)
Description
Grenzüberschreitende Mobilität wird häufig als zentraler Faktor für die Verbesserung von Lebenschancen angesehen. Dementsprechend hat in den letzten Jahren die Forschung zu den Auswirkungen der Freizügigkeit innerhalb der Europäischen Union auf die Lebenschancen mobiler Bevölkerungsgruppen zugenommen. Ein Ergebnis dieser Studien lautet, dass nicht alle MigrantInnen in gleicher Weise von den Möglichkeiten der Mobilität profitieren. Diese Unterschiede werden überwiegend auf Heterogenitäten, wie etwa den Rechtsstatus, Geschlecht, Ethnizität und Klasse zurückgeführt. Die vorliegende Forschung zu diesem Thema konzentriert sich dabei besonders auf benachteiligte oder bevorzugte Gruppen, supranationale Sozialpolitik oder Lebenslagen von MigrantInnen im Herkunfts- bzw. im Ankunftsland. Daraus ergibt sich eine Forschungslücke in Bezug auf die allgemeine Frage, wie räumliche Mobilität innerhalb des Sozialraums EU im Zusammenspiel mit anderen Heterogenitäten die soziale Position beeinflusst. Mit sozialer Position ist ein objektiver wie auch subjektiver sozioökonomischer Status gemeint. Darüber hinaus ist nicht bekannt, wie MigrantInnen sich in der Sozialstruktur der EU verorten. Das Zusammenspiel zwischen objektiven und subjektiven sozialen Positionen wird vor allem durch den Mechanismus des sozialen Vergleichs entlang unterschiedlicher Referenzrahmen bestimmt. Potenziell nutzen MigrantInnen sowohl nationale als auch transnationale Referenzrahmen für ihre subjektive Positionierung. Das Projekt setzt an dieser Stelle an und beschäftigt sich mit drei Forschungsschwerpunkten: (1) der Analyse räumlicher Mobilitätsverläufe von MigrantInnengruppen, die durch verschiedene Heterogenitäten gekennzeichnet sind; (2) dem Zusammenhang von räumlichen Mobilitätsverläufen und der sozialen Position in Bezug auf den sozio-ökonomischen Status und dessen subjektive Wahrnehmung und Bewertung; und (3) der Untersuchung des sozialen Vergleichs als Mechanismus, der die subjektive Wahrnehmung der sozialen Position beeinflusst. Im Vordergrund steht dabei die Untersuchung der Selektion von Referenzrahmen und -gruppen für soziale Vergleiche von MigrantInnen. Das sequenzielle, mixed methods-Design des Forschungsprojekts greift dazu auf Daten der IAB-SOEP-Migrantenstichprobe zurück, um typische Mobilitätsverläufe von MigrantInnen in Deutschland, sowie ihren sozio-ökonomischen Status und ihre Lebens- und Bereichszufriedenheit mit quantitativen Methoden zu analysieren. Darauf aufbauend werden qualitative Interviews mit einer Teilstichprobe der IAB-SOEP-Befragten, sowie mit Personen ohne Migrationserfahrung in einem Land der EU mit hohen Emigrationsquoten (Polen), durchgeführt. Diese erlauben eine Analyse der Bedeutung räumlicher Mobilität für die subjektive soziale Position von mobilen und nichtmobilen Bevölkerungsgruppen. Ziel des Projekts ist es, den Mechanismus des sozialen Vergleichs zu untersuchen, um den Zusammenhang zwischen räumlicher Mobilität und sozialen Positionen zu erhellen.
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32633 Project

Greece Policy Brief: Addressing Migration Challenges beyond the Current Humanitarian Crisis

Authors Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32635 Policy Brief

International migration in Luxembourg. Continuous Reporting System on Migration OECD – 2016

Authors Birte Nienaber, Sarah Jacobs, Adolfo Sommarribas, ...
Description
Luxembourg has been a country of immigration for more than 50 years. Located in the heart of Europe, it holds a strong attraction for EU citizens and nationals from countries all around the world, who play a central role in the national economy, making an important contribution to the population growth and the labour market. Over the course of 2015, Luxembourg’s population has continued its steady growth of approximately 13.000 people per year, increasing by 2,36%, from 562.958 on 1st January 2015 to 576.249 on 1st January 2016. Foreign citizens have continued to play an essential role in Luxembourg’s population growth, both in terms of net migration and births. The total net migration amounted to +11.159 individuals in 2015, which signifies a surplus of arrivals over departures. Foreign EU citizens accounted for 76,1%; third-country nationals represented 32,9%, while Luxembourgish nationals’ contribution was negative, at -9%. The number of births in 2015 was the highest on record, equal to that in 2013, with 6.115 births in total. Foreigners contributed a birth surplus of 2.150 to Luxembourg’s natural increase, while a birth deficit of -18 was recorded for Luxembourgish nationals. 2015 also marked a record year regarding naturalisations, with Belgians remaining the citizens that obtain citizenship most frequently, followed by the French and the Portuguese. On 1st January 2016, 46,7% of Luxembourg’s residents were foreigners. Representing 34,6% of the total foreign population, Portuguese remained the most represented nationality, followed by France (15,5%) and Italy (7,5%), while the most numerous third-country nationals were Montenegrins. Due to the war in Syria and the influx of applicants for international protection that followed, the Syrian population living in Luxembourg showed the highest proportional increase during 2015, growing by 461,5% from January 2015 to January 2016. A look at Luxembourg’s labour market also reveals the central role that foreigners play in the national economy. In the first quarter of 2016, residents of Luxembourg represented 55% of the country’s salaried workforce. Of these, 27,5% were Luxembourgish nationals, while EU nationals represented 24,2% and third-country nationals 3,3%. Cross-border workers from France, Belgium and Germany represented 45% of all salaried workers in Luxembourg. They mainly work in the manufacturing industries, construction and commerce. A majority of recruitments in the HORECA sector are of foreign residents. Third-country nationals who do not benefit from free movement must be issued with a residence permit in order to enter Luxembourg. An increase in first issues of residence permits was recorded for most categories compared to the preceding year, which had experienced a decrease in almost all categories. In 2015, residence permits were most frequently issued in the “family member”, “salaried worker” and “European Blue Card” categories. 2015 was marked by a significant increase in the number of applications for international protection, which has more than doubled when compared to 2014 (2.447 applications in 2015). While there was a strong increase at the end of 2015, the trend slowed down in 2016. Nonetheless, the number of applications for international protection remains higher than levels in 2013/2014. Most applications were from Syrians and Iraqis (27,3% and 22% respectively), who accounted for only 9% and 1% respectively in 2014. Moreover, both the rate of status recognition (refugee and subsidiary protection status) and of return decision increased. In 2015, Luxembourg pledged to relocate 557 individuals to Luxembourg in the framework of the EU Council decision to relocate 160.000 international protection applicants from Greece and Italy. Within this framework, 114 refugees have been relocated from Greece and 20 from Italy up until mid-August 2016. Furthermore, 46 refugees were resettled from Turkey in 2015, followed by 52 further refugees as a result of Luxembourg’s pledge to resettle 194 refugees from Turkey in the context of the EU-Turkey agreement of March 2016. Additionally, 44 Syrians were welcomed in 2015 following a request for assistance by German authorities. Faced with the increased inflow of applicants for international protection, an emergency reception plan was developed in 2015. The plan included the establishment of first-instance reception centres and the strengthening of the capacity in human resources of both the Luxembourg Reception and Integration Agency (OLAI) and the Directorate of Immigration, which is under the authority of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. The OLAI also strengthened the collaboration with stakeholders at inter-ministerial and local levels. A strong focus has also been put on integration, where major developments include the setting up of integration projects by the municipalities in the context of the ‘Communal Integration Plan’ project and the creation of Luxembourg’s Centre for Integration and Cohesion (LISKO), a service supporting the beneficiaries of international protection in their process of integration in Luxembourgish society. Over the course of 2015 and 2016, Luxembourg continued to transpose and implement several EU directives. The law of 18th December 2015 on the reception of applicants for international protection and temporary protection transposes Directive 2013/33/EU (re-cast reception conditions) into national law. The law of 18th December 2015 on international protection and temporary protection transposed Directive 2013/32/EU (re-cast procedure), establishing the procedures for granting and withdrawing international and subsidiary protection and the standardisation of the content of this protection. The bill implementing Directive 2013/55/EU on the recognition of professional qualifications was introduced into parliament in 2015 and the bill implementing Directive 2014/36/EU on seasonal workers and Directive 2014/66/EU on intra-corporate transferees and investors’ residence permits was introduced in 2016. Regarding the transposition of the Blue Card Directive, a Government Decree was issued on 22nd May 2015 establishing the professions to which the lower salary threshold for hiring highly qualified workers applies. On the national level, a number of legislative changes address some of the challenges set by Luxembourg’s heterogeneity. The bill no. 6410 on youth, introduced into parliament on 6th February 2015, gives cross-border workers access to the care service voucher system which was previously only available to Luxembourgish residents. Bill no. 6893 on the recognition of qualifications was introduced in parliament in October 2015. At the referendum of 7th June 2015, the proposal to extend the right to vote of non-Luxembourgish residents was rejected by a large majority, who argued in favour of the acquisition of nationality as the more appropriate way to acquire the right to vote. Consequently, the government took steps towards reforming the law on nationality in order to soften the requirements for acquisition of nationality, and in this way enable the broadening of participation in elections. Bill no. 6977 on nationality was introduced in parliament on 24th March 2016. It includes the reduction of the required duration of residency from seven to five years and the reintroduction of procedure of option in cases of close links with Luxembourg. The level of fluency in Luxembourgish required has become a central focus of the debate on the bill on nationality, some fearing that linguistic requirements would become an obstacle to foreigners’ acquisition of nationality, others underlining the command of the language as a central factor in integration and thus also in the acquisition of nationality.
Year 2016
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32636 Report

Juxtaposing Pakistani diaspora policy with migrants’ transnational citizenship practices

Authors Marta Bivand Erdal
Year 2016
Journal Name Geoforum
Citations (WoS) 5
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32637 Journal Article

The measure of migratory flows between France and other countries; what if we also spoke of emigration?

Authors Franck Temporal, Chantal Brutel
Year 2016
Journal Name Revue européenne des migrations internationales
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32638 Journal Article

Humanitarian Protection for Children Fleeing Gang-Based Violence in the Americas

Authors Elizabeth Carlson, Anna Marie Gallagher
Year 2015
Journal Name Journal on Migration and Human Security
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32639 Journal Article

Multi‐sited accumulation of capital: Cape Verdean returnees and small‐scale business

Authors LISA ÅKESSON
Year 2015
Journal Name Global Networks
32643 Journal Article

Postcolonial migrations and diasporic linkages between Latin America and Japan and Spain

Authors Rosalia Avila-Tàpies, Josefina Domínguez-Mujica
Year 2015
Journal Name ASIAN AND PACIFIC MIGRATION JOURNAL
32644 Journal Article

Turkish and Chinese immigration to the Netherlands : corridor report

Authors Jérémy MANDIN, Sonia GSIR
Description
This report compares two quite different corridor migrations to the Netherlands. Turkish immigration is larger and more recent than Chinese immigration, which goes back to the beginning of the 20th century. The report aims to better understand the variation in several dimensions of Turkish and Chinese immigrants’ integration – in particular, the labour market, education and citizenship. It is based on an original methodology combining different data sources (the existing literature, an analysis of the legal and political frameworks, a quantitative analysis, and a survey). It aims to test the INTERACT project’s main hypothesis which conceives of integration as a three-way process. This report provides insight on the integration policy developed in the Netherlands (ethnic minorities policies) and links it to Turkish and Chinese diaspora policies. It tries to shed light on the impact that Turkey and China may have on the integration of their diasporas in the Netherlands. The main findings are the following: firstly, the countries of origin are concerned about their migrants abroad and develop policies accordingly. Secondly, Turkish and Chinese migrants’ integration in the Netherlands present different characteristics and the interaction between the Dutch integration policy and their respective diaspora policies is a complex one. Thirdly, the impact that Turkey and China have on integration is different with regard to the different dimensions of integration. And finally, non-state actors based in the countries of origin may also have a significant impact on migrants’ integration.
Year 2015
Taxonomy View Taxonomy Associations
32650 Report
SHOW FILTERS
Ask us