Taxonomy

Could Refugees Have a Significant Impact on the Future Demographic Change of Serbia?

Authors	Vladimir NikitoviÄ, Vesna LukiÄ
Year	2010
Journal Name	International Migration
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

1 Journal Article

Development of Monitoring Instruments for Judicial and Law Enforcement institutions in the Western Balkans

Description	Objectives • To assess and improve administrative and survey-based statistics (including the field of asylum, visa and migration) that are generated by justice and home affairs institutions in 7 countries of the Western Balkans (Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, FYROM, Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia). • To bring national statistics mechanisms in justice and home affairs institutions in the 7 countries towards compliance with relevant international and European Union acquis, standards and best practices • To strengthen the response to crime and corruption in Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, FYROM, Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia Target group • Senior law enforcement officials • Prosecutors and judges • Staff of ministries of interior and ministries of justice • National statistical offices Outcomes • Preparation of a detailed written country assessment on national asylum visa and migration statistics in Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, FYROM, Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia • Preparation of recommendations related to asylum, visa and migration statistics in the countries • Design and deliver training sessions for staff of justice and home affairs institutions on asylum, visa and migration statistics for each project country and territory. Project partners The project is implemented by UNODC in partnership with the European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control affiliated with the United Nations (HEUNI), the Joint Research Centre on Transnational Crime (TRANSCRIME) and the ICMPD.
Year	2009
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

2 Project

Value Orientations of Highly Educated Migrants from Serbia

Year	2018
Journal Name	Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

3 Journal Article

Value Orientations of Highly Educated Migrants from Serbia

Authors	Jelena Dinić
Year	2018
Journal Name	Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

4 Journal Article

Ablehnungskulturen in Europa

Principal investigator	Manuela Bojadzijev (Principal Investigator)
Description	"Nationalismus und Rechtspopulismus entwickeln sich zu einem immer größer werdenden Problem für die freiheitliche demokratische Grundordnung in Europa. Sie führen zu sozialer Polarisierung sowie Radikalisierung und verändern das alltägliche Leben entscheidend. Die ""Kulturen der Ablehnung"" gegenüber Immigration, politischen Eliten, Institutionen der Zivilgesellschaft und der Medien, europäischer Integration u. ä. gehen laut der Arbeitshypothese der Forschungsprojektgruppe aus als negativ erlebten Veränderungen und Krisen hervor. Daher steht im Fokus ihrer Untersuchung unter anderem, in welchen On- und Offline-Umgebungen sich solche Gruppen bewegen und verbreiten und wie sie sich an unterschiedlichen Orten zusammensetzen. Für einen transnationalen Überblick über das Phänomen arbeiten Forscherinnen und Forscher aus Österreich, Kroatien, Deutschland, Serbien und Schweden zusammen. Das Projekt wird von der Volkswagen-Stiftung finanziert und das Team besteht aus Manuela Bojadžijev (Leuphana-Universität Lüneburg), Dr. Irena Fiket (University of Belgrade / Serbien), Prof. Dr. Birgit Sauer (Universität Wien / Österreich), Dr. Sanja Bojanic (University of Rijeka / Kroatien) and Prof. Dr. Stefan Jonsson (Linköping University / Schweden)."
Year	2019
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

5 Project

Trade Unions, Transnational Solidarity and Ethnic Divisions: EU Social Dialogue and Post-War Reconstruction in the Western Balkans

Principal investigator	Branka Likic-Brboric (REMESO Project Leader)
Description	The research project addresses the EU's regional approach to support countries in the Western Balkans in their progress towards EU membership. It focuses on the social reconstruction in post-war Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia and Croatia and the regional dialogue on social and employment policies within the Bucharest process. The study investigates local and national trade unions strategies to challenge downward pressure on labour rights and standards brought about by the implementation of a neoliberal model of reconstruction. It analyses the counter-influence of European social dimension as well as practices of the international organizations such as the UNDP, ILO and International Trade Unions Confederation (ITUC) and civil society organizations on the development of 'transethnic' regional solidarities. It also examines the forms of labour collaboration necessary to counterbalance hostile employers and governments. The main question concerns the efficacy of EU support for social dialogue and the implementation of the ILO 'decent work agenda' in empowering trade unions in their struggle for labour rights and standards in post-conflict former Yugoslavia. The issue is especially pertinent considering the wider study of post-conflict societies, marked by social fragmentation, ethnic divisions, political clientelism, poverty, informal economy and migration pressures.
Year	2009
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

6 Project

Dashboard of indicators for measuring policy and institutional coherence for migration and development (PICMD)

Description	The dashboard of indicators for measuring policy and institutional coherence for migration and development (PICMD) is a user-friendly tool that has been developed by the KNOMAD Thematic Working Group on Policy and Institutional Coherence. The dashboard aims to measure the extent to which public policies and institutional arrangements are coherent with international best practices to minimise the risks and maximise the development gains of migration, and can be used by domestic policy makers and other stakeholders such as researchers, civil society and international organisations. For policy makers, the dashboard should serve as a particularly useful tool during the policy formulation, evaluation and adjustment process. Indicators are organised around the following five policy dimensions: promote institutional coherence, reduce the costs of migration, protect the rights of migrants and their family, promote reintegration, enhance the development impact of migration. There are two distinct dashboards – one from the perspective of countries of origin and the other from the perspective of countries of destination – with separate indicators except in the area of institutional coherence. Any given country can be considered both a country of origin and a country of destination. The Thematic Working Group is currently operationalising the dashboard in 15 pilot countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cabo Verde, Germany, Jamaica, Kenya, Moldova, Morocco, the Philippines, Portugal, the Netherlands, Serbia, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, and Trinidad and Tobago.
Year	2016
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

7 Data Set

Misrecognising Minorities in Europe. Challenges to Integration and Security

Principal investigator	Andreas Zick (Principal Investigator), Stephan Reicher (Principal Investigator), Arin H. Ayanian (Project Coordinator)
Description	"One of the most relevant challenges for European societies is to avoid the isolation, separation or withdrawal of groups from mainstream society. Contemporary events show that minorities in Europe can be marginalized in European society, and that this can make them prone to adopting separatist attitudes and beliefs. The project investigates the importance of misrecognition in this process. Recognition is defined as the extent to which members of minorities feel that they are viewed by others as belonging to the nation. The project strives to understand the experiences which give rise to the sense of misrecognition and, more particularly, the role that surveillance plays in this. Moreover, it wants to understand the consequences of a state of misrecognition. When does it lead to a sense of estrangement whereby minority group members withdraw from participation and cooperation with others in the national community and with national authorities? When does it lead to becoming actively anti-community and anti-authority? The focus will be on two significant minorities in different regions of the European Union: Muslims in the West and Roma people in the East. Recent models of intergroup relations are applied to address these questions. Estrangement is regarded as arising out of interactions between minority groups and authorities. A multi-method approach is used to study these issues combing methods of experimentation and ethnography of everyday experience with interviews and surveys. Research is conducted in four Western European countries Germany, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and France) and three Eastern European countries (Hungary, Serbia, and Romania). "
Year	2019
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

8 Project

Migration and Transnational Social Protection in (post) Crisis Europe (MiTSoPro)

Description	MiTSoPro focuses on the link between migration and welfare across different European and non-European countries. The first part of the project closely examines migrants’ access to welfare in home and host countries. In doing so, the project adopts a top-down analytical approach of the concept of Transnational Social Protection from above, thus aiming to provide answers to the following research questions: Do migrants have access to social protection in Europe and beyond? What kind of social benefits can they access in their countries of residence and what type of social protection entitlements can they export from their countries of origin? Do some migrant groups benefit from an easier formal access to welfare benefits than others? Do some countries offer more inclusive social protection regimes for immigrants and emigrants alike? The first part of the project provides an in-depth analysis of eligibility conditions for accessing welfare entitlements across 40 countries. The project thus includes all EU Member States and 12 non-EU sending countries distributed across different continents, whose nationals represent an important share of the migration inflows towards European countries (the 12 non-EU countries included in the project are: Argentina, China, Ecuador, India, Lebanon, Morocco, Russia, Senegal, Serbia, Switzerland, Tunisia and Turkey). For each country, we systematically analyse migrants’ access to social benefits across five core policy areas that are closely examined via a broad range of indicators (i.e. specific types of social benefits in kind and cash): 1) Health care (benefits in kind and cash in case of sickness and invalidity benefits); 2) Unemployment (covering both unemployment insurance and unemployment assistance); 3) Old-age pensions (including contributory and non-contributory pensions); 4) Family benefits (maternity, paternity, parental, and child benefits); 5) Guaranteed minimum resources (social assistance programmes aiming to provide a “safety net” aiming to protect individuals from severe poverty). The data collection process was conducted between April 2019-January 2019, based on a survey with national experts across all country analysed. The survey included standardized questions, thus ensuring comparability across the different countries analysed, despite their different political settings and migration histories. The project covers national legislations in place in 2019. This first dataset on migrants’ access to welfare entitlement is complemented by a second one that examines the programmes and initiatives led by home countries authorities to respond to the social protection needs of their non-resident nationals. Covering the same 40 countries, this second dataset highlights the role of three key actors (consulates, diaspora institutions and home country ministries/agencies responsible for specific social policy areas) through which sending states interact with their nationals abroad across the five policy areas previously mentioned. The data collection of this second dataset is based on another survey conducted between April 2018-January 2019 with national experts across the 40 countries analysed in the project.
Year	2019
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

9 Data Set

The Second Displacement of Refugees: Urban Regeneration Against Commoning Practices in Belgrade's Waterfront

Authors	Charalampos Tsavdaroglou, Maria Kaika
Year	2023
Journal Name	Antipode
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

10 Journal Article

Mental Health in the Transit Context: Evidence from 10 Countries

Authors	Maria Caterina Gargano, Dean Ajduković, Maša Vukčević Marković
Year	2022
Journal Name	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

11 Journal Article

Editorial. Entangled Temporalities of Migration in the Western Balkans. Ethnographic Perspectives on (Im)-mobilities and Reception Governance

Authors	Stefano degli Uberti, Roberta Altin
Year	2022
Journal Name	Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

12 Journal Article

Collaboration or resistance? - The ideological divide among Russian emigration in Yugoslavia in 1941

Authors	Petra Kim Krasnić
Year	2021
Journal Name	Retrospektive
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

13 Journal Article

Visualising Invisible (Migrant) Activism

Authors	Piotr Goldstein
Year	2021
Journal Name	Entanglements
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

14 Journal Article

Statelessness index

Description	The Statelessness Index is a comparative tool that assesses European countries’ law, policy and practice on the protection of stateless people and the prevention and reduction of statelessness, against international norms and good practice. It is a tool created for civil society, government, researchers, the media and other interested individuals. The Index was developed and is maintained by the European Network on Statelessness (ENS). The Index allows users to quickly understand which areas of law, policy and practice can be improved by states and which can be looked to as examples of good practice in addressing statelessness. The Index is the first to provide comprehensive and accessible comparative analysis of European countries’ efforts to address statelessness. The Index assesses how countries in Europe perform against international norms and good practice for the protection of stateless people and the prevention and reduction of statelessness. A country’s performance is assessed against a set of benchmarks drawn from international and regional human rights standards, soft law, relevant reports, and consultation with experts. The index covers 18 countries for the period 2017-2019. It consists of 23 indicators sorted in 5 strands: International and regional instruments; Statelessness Population Data Availability; Statelessness Determination and Status; Detention; Prevention and Reduction. The country data is gathered through a detailed survey, structured around the themes and subthemes. The surveys are completed by country experts (researchers, lawyers, NGOs and other civil society actors), referenced with links to sources, reviewed by a second country expert, and then returned to the ENS Secretariat for analysis.
Year	2019
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

15 Data Set

Decision Making on the Balkan Route and the EU-Turkey Statement

Authors	Maastricht University, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Koc University, ...
Description	In 2015, there were higher than normal migration flows from Turkey to Greece and then via the Western Balkans to other European Union (EU) countries, leading to what has been termed Europe’s ‘refugee crisis’. The primary research question guiding this study is: How can the fluctuations in migration flows on the Balkans route from January 2015-December 2018 be explained? The core sub-questions guiding this research are:What explanations are there for the sharp decrease in the number of refugees and migrants on the Balkans route even before the EU-Turkey Statement came into effect?What are the decision making factors of refugees and migrants when choosing to leave Turkey before and after the EU-Turkey Statement?To what extent do policy interventions impact refugees and migrants’ decision-making regarding routes and destination choices?
Year	2019
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

16 Report

Exclusionary moments: Queer desires and migrants' sense of (un)belonging

Authors	Linda Solveigar-Gudmundsdottir
Year	2018
Journal Name	Emotion, Space and Society
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

17 Journal Article

MACIMIDE Global Expatriate Dual Citizenship Database

Description	The MACIMIDE Global Expatriate Dual Citizenship Dataset charts the rules that existed in near all states of the world since 1960 with regard to the loss or renunciation of citizenship after a citizen of a respective state voluntarily acquires the citizenship of another state. The central variable of the Dataset is the dualcit_cat variable. This is a categorical variable whose values may be used to interpret, in broad lines, the position of a country with regards to the expatriate dual citizenship. The dualcit_cat variable reflects what consequences the legislation and legal practice of a country attaches to the voluntary acquisition of a foreign citizenship. The value of this variable depends on a number of criteria, including whether a citizen of the reference country who voluntarily obtains a foreign citizenship automatically loses – in principle – the citizenship of the origin country, and whether a citizen of the reference country can renounce that citizenship. The value assigned to dualcit_cat reflects the position of the country on the 1st of January of the reference year. Any subsequent changes in legislation will be reflected in the dualcit_cat value of the following year and included in updated versions of the Dataset. The dualcit_binary variable is a recoding of the dualcit_cat variable. This variable can be used for broad comparisons of the dual citizenship positions around the world. The possible values reflect whether the legislation of a country, in a given reference year, provides for the automatic loss of the origin citizenship (1) or not (2). All data have been centrally collected and refer to specific provisions in national law.
Year	2018
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

18 Data Set

Albanian Citizenship Configurations in the Balkans

Authors	Gezim Krasniqi
Year	2017
Journal Name	Central and Eastern European Migration Review
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

19 Journal Article

Citizenship law indicators (CITLAW)

Description	CITLAW indicators address citizenship laws (acquisition and loss of citizenship) in Europe. Basic indicator scores are calculated on the basis of a list of substantive and procedural requirements for each mode of acquisition or loss using both additive and weighting formulas. CITLAW indicators are also aggregated at different levels in order to analyse more general features of citizenship laws. The 6 highest level CITLAW indicators that are calculated using all 45 basic indicators are: ius sanguinis, ius soli, residence-based ordinary naturalisation, naturalisation on specific grounds, voluntary renunciation and withdrawal/lapse. CITLAW indicators have been calculated for 42 European states for 2011 and 2016. Coding of CITLAW indicators is based on an assessment of legal provisions in national citizenship laws.
Year	2016
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

20 Data Set

World Population Policies Database

Description	Since the mid-1970s, the World Population Policies Database, last updated in 2015, provides comprehensive and up-to-date information on the population policy situation and trends for all Member States and non-member States of the United Nations. Among several areas, the database shows the evolution of government views and policies with respect to internal and international migration. The migration strand covers internal migration, immigration, emigration, and return. The Database is updated biennially by conducting a detailed country-by-country review of national plans and strategies, programme reports, legislative documents, official statements and various international, Inter-governmental and non-governmental sources, as well as by using official responses to the United Nations Inquiry among Governments on Population and Development.
Year	2015
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

21 Data Set

Citizenship Implementation indicators (CITIMP)

Description	EUDO Citizenship Implementation Indicators measure on a 0 to 1 scale the formal aspects of naturalisation procedures: promotion activities, documentation requirements, administrative discretion, bureaucratic procedures, and review and appeal options. CITIMP indicators allow for comparisons of the specific steps in the procedure across countries. CITIMP indicators have been calculated for 35 European states, as well as for three German federal provinces. CITIMP indicators are an output of the research project 'Access to Citizenship and its Impact on Immigrant Integration (ACIT). = The project was financially supported by the European Fund for the Integration of Third Country Nationals, administered by DG Home Affairs. CITIMP indicators were computed on the grounds of self-collected information: questionnaires on implementation of citizenship policies were filled out by country experts.
Year	2012
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

22 Data Set

Leaving the past behind? When victims of trafficking decline assistance

Authors	Anette Brunovskis, Rebecca Surtees
Year	2012
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

23 Report

Out of sight? - Approaches and challenges in the identification of trafficked persons

Authors	Anette Brunovskis, Rebecca Surtees
Year	2012
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

24 Report

No place like home? - Challenges in family reintegration after trafficking

Authors	Anette Brunovskis, Rebecca Surtees
Year	2012
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

25 Report

A fuller picture - Addressing trafficking-related assistance needs and socio-economic vulnerabilities

Authors	Anette Brunovskis, Rebecca Surtees
Year	2012
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

26 Report

UN Inquiry on population and development - International Migration

Description	The Inquiry gathers critically important data for monitoring the implementation of the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development and other international agreements, including the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The Inquiry, mandated by the General Assembly in its resolution 1838 (XVII) of 18 December 1962, has been conducted by the Secretary-General at regular intervals since 1963. The Twelfth Inquiry consists of multiple-choice questions, organized in three thematic modules: Module I on population ageing and urbanization; Module II on fertility, family planning and reproductive health; and Module III on international migration. In 1994, Member States attending the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) in Cairo agreed that “population-related goals and policies are integral parts of cultural, economic and social development” and recommended that actions be taken “to measure, assess, monitor and evaluate progress towards meeting the goals of its Programme of Action”. The year 2019 will mark the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Cairo conference and adoption of the ICPD Programme of Action, which continues to provide crucial guidance for addressing the fundamental development challenges facing the world today. Population issues are also at the core of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development adopted in 2015. The United Nations Inquiry among Governments on Population and Development (the “Inquiry”) gathers critically important data for monitoring the implementation of the ICPD Programme of Action and other international agreements, including the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The Inquiry, mandated by the General Assembly in its resolution 1838 (XVII) of 18 December 1962, has been conducted by the Secretary-General at regular intervals since 1963. The most recent Inquiry, the Eleventh, was implemented in 2014.
Year	2010
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

27 Data Set

Dumbrava’s Citizenship Policy Index

Description	Dumbrava’s Citizenship Policy Index, which builds on Howard,s citizenship policy index, analyses the citizenship regulations (citizenship laws and additional relevant legislation) in sixteen postcommunist countries in two periods of time (in the 1990s and 2000s). The index focuses on theregulations regarding the acquisition of citizenship- at birth (ius soli, ius sanguinis and overlapping) and through regular naturalization (without facilitations). In discussing the naturalization rules, a numeric scale has been designed to measure the “restrictive”-ness of citizenship rules (0-20). In order to measure the restrictiveness of the naturalization regulations, the present codification took into consideration five categories of requirements: residence (4 points), integration language and society/constitution (2+2 points), personal record criminal and political (2+2 points), loyalty- dual citizenship and oath of allegiance (3+1 points) and welfare income and medical situation (2+2 points). The index represents the sum of the indicators.
Year	2009
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

28 Data Set

Vikhrov's visa index

Description	The index is based on three types of entry visa restrictions: visa required, visa not required for short stays and visa not required. The author identifies country pairs which changed their visa regime during 1998–2010. This immigration policy index is constructed for all countries and territories in the world for both March 1998 and November 2009. This index is heterogeneous across destination and origin countries as well as over time.
Year	2009
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

29 Data Set

Diaspora Engagment Policies

Description	Based on review of documentary sources on state-emigrant relations, the dataset reviews how 64 states relate to their diasporas. It shows how states constitute various extra-territorial groups as members of a loyal diaspora, through a diverse range of institutions and practices. Three higher-level types of diaspora engagement policy are identified: 1 - capacity building policies, aimed at discursively producing a state-centric ‘transnational national society’, and developing a set of corresponding state institution; 2 - extending rights to the diaspora, thus playing a role that befits a legitimate sovereign, and 3 - extracting obligations from the diaspora, based on the premise that emigrants owe loyalty to this legitimate sovereign.
Year	2008
Taxonomy	View Taxonomy Associations

30 Data Set

Serbia

Type of item

Year

Languages

migration processes

migration consequences...

migration governance

cross-cutting topics...

Disciplines

Methods

Geographies

Publications

Publishers

Bringing migration research under one roof.