The prevention of secondary movements is a key political issue in the reform of Common European Asylum System (CEAS). Distrust in the effectiveness of proposed measures is one of the reasons for the deadlock in negotiations beyond the issue of solidarity.
2016 Commision proposals include punitive measuressuch as restrictions to the freedom of movement and withdrawal of reception conditions for applicants who abscond and engage in secondary movements. European Parliament, however, in its Report on the Commission’s proposal states that “the provision of high quality reception conditions, at the same level throughout the EU will be the most important factor in preventing secondary movements”.
Authors | Muzaffer Sevda Tunaboylu, Ilse van Liempt |
Year | 2020 |
Journal Name | Journal of Refugee Studies |
Citations (WoS) | 3 |
Authors | Antje Missbach |
Year | 2017 |
Journal Name | Refuge: Canada's Journal on Refugees |
Authors | Angeliki Dimitriadi |
Year | 2022 |
Book Title | Challenging Mobilities in and to the EU during Times of Crises |
Authors | Izabella Majcher |
Year | 2020 |
Journal Name | Refugee Survey Quarterly |
Citations (WoS) | 4 |
Authors | Jan-Paul Brekke, Grete Brochmann |
Year | 2014 |
Journal Name | Journal of Refugee Studies |
Year | 2014 |
Authors | Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, Nikolas F. Tan |
Year | 2017 |
Journal Name | Journal on Migration and Human Security |