The prevention of secondary movements is a key political issue in the reform of Common European Asylum System (CEAS). Distrust in the effectiveness of proposed measures is one of the reasons for the deadlock in negotiations beyond the issue of solidarity. 2016 Commision proposals include punitive measuressuch as restrictions to the freedom of movement and withdrawal of reception conditions for applicants who abscond and engage in secondary movements. European Parliament, however, in its Report on the Commission’s proposal states that “the provision of high quality reception conditions, at the same level throughout the EU will be the most important factor in preventing secondary movements”.
Publications
-
ReSOMA Ask the Expert Policy Briefs are highly informative tools proposed in the framework of the ReSOMA project. They tap into the most recent academic research on the policy topics covered by ReSOMA and map it out in a...
-
ReSOMA Ask the Expert Policy Briefs are highly informative tools proposed in the framework of the ReSOMA project. They tap into the most recent academic research on the policy topics covered by ReSOMA and map it out in a...
-
ReSOMA Discussion Briefs aim to address key topics of the European migration and integration debate in a timely matter. They bring together the expertise of stakeholder organisations and academic research institutes in o...
-
ReSOMA National Stakeholder Reports aim to inquire the stakeholders’ response to the evolving EU policy agenda and assess the unmet needs in EU Member states. They also offer a key opportunity to bring the policy trends...
-
Building on the identification of pivotal topics and controversies in the Discussion Briefs, ReSOMA Policy Option Briefs put forward the policy alternatives that can fill the key gaps at EU/national level and map their s...